There are 2,622 Planet Fitness locations in the United States of America as of January 11, 2026. The state or territory with the most Planet Fitness locations is California, with 216 sites, accounting for roughly 8.2% of the total.


Planet Fitness operates 2,622 United States of America locations across 51 states. Largest clusters are in California, Texas, and Florida; the top 10 states contain 53.0% of sites. Coverage is thinner in SouthDakota, Wyoming, and DistrictofColumbia.

Planet Fitness shows strong visitor engagement: 1226 locations are above the mean traffic score (mean: 47.27) and 406 qualify as highly visited.
Planet Fitness operates 2,622 locations across the United States, with California leading at 216 locations (8.2% of total) and Texas close behind with 208 locations (7.9%). The top three states together account for 22.7% of all locations, while the top ten states hold 53.0%. Massachusetts offers the best access, having the lowest population per location at 75,915, whereas Hawaii is the most stretched with 241,765 people per location.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as LosAngeles, Cook, Maricopa, Harris, and Dallas. The top 10 cities account for 10.6% of U.S. sites.

Planet Fitness has a total of 2,622 locations across the United States. The top city by location count is Los Angeles, California, with 54 gyms, followed by Cook, Illinois, with 43 locations. The top 10 cities collectively account for 10.6% of all Planet Fitness locations. Other notable cities include Maricopa, Arizona (36 locations), and Harris, Texas (32 locations).
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Planet Fitness locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Planet Fitness operates a total of 2622 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Planet Fitness locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Planet Fitness has 2622 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Planet Fitness locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Planet Fitness is operating from different prespectives.

Planet Fitness locations in the United States are distributed across states with varying land areas. Texas, the largest state by area at 695,668 km², hosts 208 locations, while Ohio, the smallest among the listed states at 116,098 km², has 113 locations. California has the highest number of locations at 216 despite a smaller area of 423,965 km². Some states like New York and North Carolina have unspecified land areas but maintain substantial location counts of 151 and 93, respectively.

Planet Fitness locations in the United States show varied business status across states. Pennsylvania has the highest share of open locations at 81.9%, with 113 out of 138 total sites operational. California has the largest number of open locations at 107 but a lower open percentage of 49.5% out of 216 total. Georgia and Michigan report no closed locations, with open percentages of 67.7% and 60.0%, respectively.
This view compares activity near Planet Fitness locations across states. Using traffic scores observed around 2,622 sites, it highlights the busiest markets, states with a high share of above-average locations, and areas where activity is comparatively light. Use it to benchmark performance, prioritize field operations, and spot expansion or optimization opportunities.

Planet Fitness locations in the United States show varying levels of busyness by state. California has the highest number of busy locations at 52 out of 216, representing 24.1%. New York has the highest percentage of busy sites at 25.8%, with 39 out of 151 locations. Texas and Florida also have over 24% of their locations classified as busy, with 51 and 42 busy locations respectively.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Planet Fitness. Using ratings and review totals from 2,622 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Planet Fitness has the highest average rating in North Carolina at 4.5, followed closely by Florida, Georgia, Illinois, and Michigan, each with an average rating of 4.4. Texas leads in the number of reviews with 140,350, while Florida and California also have significant review counts of 135,146 and 110,309 respectively. Illinois appears prominently with a 4.4 average rating and 71,902 reviews.
Planet Fitness receives the highest average ratings in North Carolina at 4.5, followed closely by Florida, Georgia, Illinois, and Michigan, each with an average rating of 4.4. In terms of review volume, Texas leads with 140,350 reviews, trailed by Florida with 135,146 and California with 110,309. New York and Illinois complete the top five states by review count, with 82,670 and 71,902 reviews respectively.

Planet Fitness has full phone coverage across all listed states in the United States, with 100% of locations reachable by phone. California leads with 216 locations, followed by Texas with 208 and Florida with 172. Other states like New York, Pennsylvania, and Ohio also maintain complete phone accessibility for all their Planet Fitness sites.
Planet Fitness POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.