There are 452 Kona Ice locations in the United States of America as of November 17, 2025. The state or territory with the most Kona Ice locations is Texas, with 54 sites, accounting for roughly 11.9% of the total.


Kona Ice operates 452 United States of America locations across 47 states. Largest clusters are in Texas, California, and Florida; the top 10 states contain 54.9% of sites. Coverage is thinner in South Dakota, Tamaulipas, and Wyoming.

Kona Ice shows strong visitor engagement: 4 locations are above the mean traffic score (mean: 43.44) and 1 qualify as highly visited.
Kona Ice has a total of 452 locations across the United States, with Texas leading at 54 locations (11.9%), followed by California with 43 (9.5%) and Florida with 35 (7.7%), together accounting for 29.2% of all locations. The top 10 states represent 54.9% of locations, with North Carolina, Ohio, and Georgia among them. New Hampshire, West Virginia, and Arkansas offer the best access, having the lowest populations per location, while Massachusetts, New York, and Minnesota are the most stretched with populations exceeding 1.8 million per location.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Los Angeles, Orange, Maricopa, Hillsborough, and Fairfax. The top 10 cities account for 7.3% of U.S. sites.

Kona Ice has a total of 452 locations across the United States. The top city by location count is Los Angeles, California, with 7 locations, followed by Orange, California, with 5 locations. The top 10 cities collectively account for 7.3% of all locations, with several cities having between 2 and 4 locations each.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Kona Ice locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Kona Ice operates a total of 452 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Kona Ice locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Kona Ice has 452 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Kona Ice locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Kona Ice is operating from different prespectives.

Kona Ice has the most locations in Texas, which is also the largest state by land area at approximately 695,668 km², with 54 locations. California follows with 43 locations across 423,965 km². Indiana is the smallest state listed by land area at about 94,331 km², hosting 15 Kona Ice locations. Other notable states include Florida with 35 locations and Michigan with 14, despite its larger area of 250,486 km².

Kona Ice operates predominantly open businesses across key U.S. states, with California, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Indiana, Michigan, and Tennessee all reporting 100% open status. Texas and Florida have slightly lower open percentages at 96.3% and 97.1%, respectively. Texas has the highest total number of locations at 54, followed by California with 43. No closed businesses were reported in any of these states.
This view compares activity near Kona Ice locations across states. Using traffic scores observed around 452 sites, it highlights the busiest markets, states with a high share of above-average locations, and areas where activity is comparatively light. Use it to benchmark performance, prioritize field operations, and spot expansion or optimization opportunities.

Kona Ice has busy locations in five states, with Michigan showing the highest busy rate at 7.1% (1 busy out of 14 total). Indiana follows with 6.7%, Florida with 2.9%, California with 2.3%, and Texas with 1.9%. The remaining states—Georgia, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee—have no busy locations.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Kona Ice. Using ratings and review totals from 452 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Kona Ice has its highest average rating in North Carolina at 4.8, followed by Georgia and Indiana at 4.7 each. Texas and Florida have average ratings of 4.6 and 4.5, respectively. Texas leads in the number of reviews with 411, while Florida and California follow with 359 and 316 reviews. North Carolina, despite having the top rating, has 255 reviews.
Kona Ice received the highest average rating in North Carolina at 4.8, followed by Georgia and Indiana with 4.7 each. Texas led in total reviews with 411, while Florida and California followed with 359 and 316 reviews respectively. North Carolina, despite having fewer reviews than Texas and Florida, ranked high in both average rating and review count.

Kona Ice has full phone coverage across all its locations in the United States, with each state reporting 100% phone availability. Texas leads with 54 locations, followed by California with 43 and Florida with 35. Other states like North Carolina, Ohio, and Georgia also maintain complete phone coverage for their respective 24, 18, and 16 locations.
Kona Ice POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.