There are 50 JuiceLand locations in the United States of America as of December 01, 2025. The state or territory with the most JuiceLand locations is Texas, with 50 sites, accounting for roughly 100.0% of the total.


JuiceLand operates 50 United States of America locations across 1 states. Largest clusters are in Texas; the top 10 states contain 100.0% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Texas.

JuiceLand shows strong visitor engagement: 25 locations are above the mean traffic score (mean: 51.49) and 9 qualify as highly visited.
JuiceLand operates exclusively in Texas, with all 50 of its locations situated there, representing 100% of its presence in the United States. Texas also ranks as both the best access and most stretched state, with one location serving approximately 584,867 people. The brand's top three and top ten states share percentages both stand at 100%, reflecting its concentrated market focus.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Travis, Harris, Dallas, Williamson, and Tarrant. The top 10 cities account for 100.0% of U.S. sites.

JuiceLand operates 50 locations across the United States, all concentrated in Texas. Travis leads with 29 locations, followed by Harris with 8 and Dallas with 7. The top six cities collectively account for 100% of the brand's locations, highlighting a strong regional focus.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple JuiceLand locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. JuiceLand operates a total of 50 nationwide.

The complete dataset of JuiceLand locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

JuiceLand has 50 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for JuiceLand locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how JuiceLand is operating from different prespectives.

JuiceLand operates 50 locations in Texas, which is also the largest state by land area in the United States, covering approximately 695,668 km². Notably, Texas is both the largest and smallest state listed in the data.

JuiceLand operates 50 locations in Texas, all of which are currently open, resulting in a 100% open rate. There are no closed stores reported in the state. This indicates full operational status for the brand within Texas.
This view compares activity near JuiceLand locations across states. Using traffic scores observed around 50 sites, it highlights the busiest markets, states with a high share of above-average locations, and areas where activity is comparatively light. Use it to benchmark performance, prioritize field operations, and spot expansion or optimization opportunities.

JuiceLand's busiest locations in the United States are primarily in Texas, where 12 out of 50 stores, or 24%, are classified as busy. This represents the highest concentration of busy locations by state for the brand.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward JuiceLand. Using ratings and review totals from 50 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

JuiceLand's highest average rating in the United States is in Texas, with a score of 4.6. Texas also leads in the number of reviews, totaling 13,813. This indicates strong customer engagement and satisfaction in that state.
JuiceLand's highest average rating in the United States is 4.6, achieved by Texas. Texas also leads in total reviews, with 13,813 submitted.

JuiceLand achieved full phone coverage in Texas, with all 50 locations equipped with phones, resulting in a 100% coverage rate. This represents complete phone availability for the brand within the state.
JuiceLand POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.