There are 343 Avon locations in the United States of America as of January 11, 2026. The state or territory with the most Avon locations is Texas, with 41 sites, accounting for roughly 12.0% of the total.


Avon operates 343 United States of America locations across 43 states. Largest clusters are in Texas, NewYork, and California; the top 10 states contain 57.7% of sites. Coverage is thinner in NorthDakota, SouthDakota, and WestVirginia.

Avon shows strong visitor engagement: 65 locations are above the mean traffic score (mean: 40.67) and 18 qualify as highly visited.
Avon operates 343 locations across the United States, with Texas leading at 41 locations (12.0% of total), followed by New York with 31 locations (9.0%) and California with 29 locations (8.5%). The top three states account for 29.4% of all locations, while the top ten states represent 57.7%. Arkansas, Alabama, and Wisconsin offer the best access based on population per location, whereas Colorado, Washington, and Iowa are the most stretched markets with the highest population per location ratios.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Harris, LosAngeles, Hidalgo, Maricopa, and SanBernardino. The top 10 cities account for 14.6% of U.S. sites.

Avon has a total of 343 locations across the United States. The top 10 cities account for 14.6% of all locations, with Harris, Texas leading at 8 locations. Los Angeles, California follows closely with 7 locations, while Hidalgo, Texas; Maricopa, Arizona; and San Bernardino, California each have 5 locations. Several other cities, including Kings and Richmond in New York, San Diego in California, Philadelphia in Pennsylvania, and Prince William in Virginia, each host 4 Avon locations.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Avon locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Avon operates a total of 343 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Avon locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Avon has 343 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Avon locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Avon is operating from different prespectives.

Avon locations in the United States are spread across several states, with Texas having the largest land area at approximately 695,668 km² and 41 locations. California and Florida follow with areas of about 423,965 km² and 184,934 km², hosting 29 and 23 locations respectively. Ohio has the smallest land area among the listed states at around 116,098 km², with 14 Avon locations. Some states like New York and New Jersey have location counts but missing area data.

In the United States, Avon has varying business statuses across states, with Texas having the highest total locations at 41 and an open percentage of 46.3%. Michigan shows the highest proportion of open businesses at 58.3% out of 12 total. New York and Georgia have lower open percentages, at 22.6% and 23.1% respectively. Wisconsin has the lowest open share at 18.2% among 11 total locations.
This view compares activity near Avon locations across states. Using traffic scores observed around 343 sites, it highlights the busiest markets, states with a high share of above-average locations, and areas where activity is comparatively light. Use it to benchmark performance, prioritize field operations, and spot expansion or optimization opportunities.

For Avon in the United States, New York and Texas have the highest number of busy locations at 5 each. Wisconsin shows the highest percentage of busy locations at 18.2%, despite having only 2 busy sites out of 11 total. California has 3 busy locations, representing 10.3% of its total. Other states like Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Alabama also have notable busy location percentages above 14%.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Avon. Using ratings and review totals from 343 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Avon received its highest average rating of 5.0 in Michigan, followed by Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, each with an average rating of 4.8. New York also showed a strong average rating of 4.7. In terms of review volume, California led with 228 reviews, while New York and Florida followed with 174 and 110 reviews respectively. Michigan, despite having the top average rating, had 44 reviews, placing it fifth in review count.
Avon received the highest average rating of 5.0 in Michigan, followed by Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin with ratings of 4.8. California led in total reviews with 228, while New York and Florida followed with 174 and 110 reviews, respectively. Michigan, despite having the highest average rating, contributed 44 reviews, ranking fifth in review volume.

Avon achieved full phone coverage across all listed states in the United States, with 100% of individuals having phones. Texas had the highest count at 41, followed by New York with 31 and California with 29. Each of the ten states reported complete coverage, ranging from 11 to 41 individuals with phones.
Avon POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.