There are 3,355 Zipcar locations in the United States of America as of January 26, 2026. The state or territory with the most Zipcar locations is NewYork, with 621 sites, accounting for roughly 18.5% of the total.


Zipcar operates 3,355 United States of America locations across 43 states. Largest clusters are in NewYork, California, and Massachusetts; the top 10 states contain 78.4% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Nevada, NewMexico, and Vermont.

Zipcar shows strong visitor engagement: 1345 locations are above the mean traffic score (mean: 43.66) and 519 qualify as highly visited.
Zipcar has a total of 3,355 locations across the United States, with nearly half (47%) concentrated in its top three states: New York (621 locations), California (564), and Massachusetts (392). These top ten states account for 78.4% of all locations, highlighting significant regional clustering. Massachusetts, Maryland, and Oregon offer the best access with the lowest population per location, while Nevada, Kansas, and Oklahoma are the most stretched, each having over 1.3 million people per location.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as NewYork, Cook, SanFrancisco, Suffolk, and DistrictofColumbia. The top 10 cities account for 50.2% of U.S. sites.

Zipcar operates 3,355 locations across the United States, with the top 10 cities accounting for 50.2% of all locations. New York, New York leads with 232 locations, followed closely by Cook, Illinois with 228 and San Francisco, California with 218. The remaining top cities each have between 79 and 179 locations, highlighting a concentrated presence in key metropolitan areas.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Zipcar locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Zipcar operates a total of 3355 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Zipcar locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Zipcar has 3355 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Zipcar locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Zipcar is operating from different prespectives.

Zipcar has the most locations in New York with 621, followed by California with 564 locations. California is the largest state by land area among the top states, spanning approximately 423,965 km², while Massachusetts is the smallest at about 27,335 km². Other notable states include Illinois with 243 locations and Washington covering 184,668 km².

In the United States, Zipcar has a predominantly closed business status across key states. Massachusetts shows the highest proportion of open locations at 1.0%, with 4 open out of 24 total. Washington follows with 2.0% open (3 open, 19 total), while New York and California have open percentages below 0.5%, despite large totals of 621 and 564 respectively. Several states, including Illinois, District of Columbia, Pennsylvania, Oregon, and Florida, report no open locations.
This view compares activity near Zipcar locations across states. Using traffic scores observed around 3,355 sites, it highlights the busiest markets, states with a high share of above-average locations, and areas where activity is comparatively light. Use it to benchmark performance, prioritize field operations, and spot expansion or optimization opportunities.

Zipcar's busiest locations in the United States show Maryland with the highest busy percentage at 24.6%, followed closely by the District of Columbia at 24.1%. New York has the largest number of busy locations at 139, representing 22.4% of its total 621 locations. California ranks second in busy locations count with 109, making up 19.3% of its 564 locations. Illinois, Massachusetts, and Oregon also have busy location percentages above 23%.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Zipcar. Using ratings and review totals from 3,355 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Zipcar's highest average ratings of 3.6 are found in California, District of Columbia, Maryland, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania. New York leads in review volume with 1,029 reviews, followed by California with 600 and Massachusetts with 402. Illinois and Pennsylvania also have notable review counts of 201 and 182, respectively.
Zipcar's highest average rating of 3.6 is shared by California, District of Columbia, Maryland, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania. New York leads in total reviews with 1,029, followed by California with 600 and Massachusetts with 402. Illinois and Pennsylvania also contribute notable review counts of 201 and 182, respectively.

Zipcar achieves full phone coverage across all listed states in the United States, with each state showing 100% of entries having phone numbers. New York leads with 621 phone-covered entries, followed by California with 564 and Massachusetts with 392. The smallest coverage among these states is in Florida, with 84 entries, all fully covered by phone.
Zipcar POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.