There are 28 ZF locations in the United States of America as of April 18, 2026. The state or territory with the most ZF locations is Michigan, with 12 sites, accounting for roughly 42.9% of the total.


ZF operates 28 United States of America locations across 10 states. Largest clusters are in Michigan, Georgia, and Illinois; the top 10 states contain 100.0% of sites. Coverage is thinner in California, NorthCarolina, and Ohio.

ZF operates 28 locations across the United States, with Michigan hosting the largest share at 42.9% (12 locations). The top three states—Michigan, Georgia, and Illinois—account for 64.3% of all locations. Michigan offers the best access with one location per 838,160 residents, while California is the most stretched, with a single location serving over 39 million people. All ten listed states collectively represent 100% of ZF's U.S. locations.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Oakland, Hall, Ingham, Lapeer, and Livingston. The top 10 cities account for 64.3% of U.S. sites.

ZF operates 28 locations across the United States, with 64.3% concentrated in the top 10 cities. Oakland, Michigan leads with 4 locations, followed by Hall, Georgia with 3. Several Michigan cities, including Ingham, Lapeer, and Livingston, each host 2 locations, highlighting the brand's significant presence in that state.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple ZF locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. ZF operates a total of 28 nationwide.

The complete dataset of ZF locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

ZF has 28 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for ZF locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how ZF is operating from different prespectives.

The ZF brand's locations in the United States span several states with varying land areas. California has the largest state land area at approximately 423,965 km², while Indiana has the smallest among the listed states at about 94,331 km². Michigan hosts the most ZF locations, totaling 12, despite having a mid-range land area of roughly 250,486 km². Some states like South Carolina and North Carolina have location counts but missing area data.

In the United States, ZF has the highest number of open locations in Michigan with 9 out of 12 total, representing 75% open. Georgia, Indiana, North Carolina, California, Ohio, and Arizona each have all their locations open, with 100% open rates. Illinois has 1 open location out of 3 (33.3%), while South Carolina has 2 open out of 3 (66.7%). Alabama has 1 location listed but none open or closed.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward ZF. Using ratings and review totals from 28 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

For the brand ZF in the United States, Ohio leads with the highest average rating of 4.8, followed by Michigan at 4.6 and Alabama at 4.4. Georgia has a lower average rating of 3.9. South Carolina has the most reviews at 417, while Michigan and Georgia also have significant review counts of 178 and 169, respectively.
For the brand ZF in the United States, South Carolina leads in total reviews with 417, followed by Michigan with 178 and Georgia with 169. Ohio ranks highest in average rating at 4.8, while Michigan and Alabama have average ratings of 4.6 and 4.4, respectively. California's average rating is not available.

In the United States, ZF achieved 100% phone coverage across all listed states. Michigan had the highest count with 12 phones, while Georgia, Illinois, and South Carolina each had 3 phones fully covered. States including Indiana, Alabama, Arizona, California, North Carolina, and Ohio also reported complete phone coverage, with totals ranging from 1 to 2 phones.
ZF POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.