There are 127 US Foods locations in the United States of America as of February 16, 2026. The state or territory with the most US Foods locations is Texas, with 9 sites, accounting for roughly 7.1% of the total.


US Foods operates 127 United States of America locations across 44 states. Largest clusters are in Texas, California, and NewYork; the top 10 states contain 49.6% of sites. Coverage is thinner in SouthDakota, Utah, and Wisconsin.

US Foods shows strong visitor engagement: 21 locations are above the mean traffic score (mean: 49.3) and 7 qualify as highly visited.
US Foods operates 127 locations across the United States, with Texas leading at 9 locations (7.1% of total), followed by California with 8 (6.3%) and New York and Pennsylvania each with 7 (5.5%). The top three states account for 18.9% of all locations, while the top ten states represent 49.6%. Montana, Kansas, and Alaska have the best access with the lowest population per location, whereas Michigan, Massachusetts, and Indiana are the most stretched with over 6.7 million people per location.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Maricopa, SaintLouis, Dallas, Clark, and Hennepin. The top 10 cities account for 18.1% of U.S. sites.

US Foods operates 127 locations across the United States, with the top 10 cities accounting for 18.1% of these. Maricopa, Arizona leads with 4 locations, followed by Saint Louis, Missouri with 3. Eight other cities, including Dallas, Texas and Clark, Nevada, each have 2 locations.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple US Foods locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. US Foods operates a total of 127 nationwide.

The complete dataset of US Foods locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

US Foods has 127 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for US Foods locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how US Foods is operating from different prespectives.

US Foods has the most locations in Texas, which is also the largest state listed with an area of 695,668 km² and 9 locations. California follows with 8 locations and an area of 423,965 km². Pennsylvania is the smallest state by land area among those listed, covering 119,279 km², with 7 locations. Some states like New York and South Carolina have location counts but missing area data.

US Foods operates a total of 67 locations across ten U.S. states, with the highest number in Texas (9) and California (8). New York, South Carolina, Florida, Missouri, and Kansas each report 100% open locations, while Minnesota has the lowest open percentage at 60%. Pennsylvania and Arizona show moderate closure rates, with open percentages of 71.4% and 66.7%, respectively. Overall, most states maintain high operational status, with minimal closures.
This view compares activity near US Foods locations across states. Using traffic scores observed around 127 sites, it highlights the busiest markets, states with a high share of above-average locations, and areas where activity is comparatively light. Use it to benchmark performance, prioritize field operations, and spot expansion or optimization opportunities.

US Foods has one busy location in each of ten states across the United States. Florida, Minnesota, Kansas, Missouri, and South Carolina each show a busy location share of 20%, the highest among the states listed. Texas has the largest total number of locations at nine, with a busy location share of 11.1%. Other states like California and New York have busy location shares ranging from 12.5% to 16.7%.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward US Foods. Using ratings and review totals from 127 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

US Foods has the highest average rating in Minnesota at 4.0, followed by Arizona with 3.9 and Missouri at 3.8. South Carolina and New York have average ratings of 3.7 and 3.6, respectively. Florida leads in the number of reviews with 1,789, while South Carolina and California follow with 1,366 and 1,314 reviews. Texas and Pennsylvania complete the top five states by review count, with 1,028 and 1,001 reviews respectively.
US Foods received the highest number of reviews in Florida with 1,789, followed by South Carolina and California with 1,366 and 1,314 reviews respectively. Minnesota leads in average rating at 4.0, while Arizona and Missouri follow with ratings of 3.9 and 3.8. South Carolina and New York round out the top five states by average rating, with 3.7 and 3.6 respectively.

US Foods achieved complete phone coverage in all listed states across the United States. Texas leads with 9 out of 9 locations having phone access, followed by California with 8 out of 8. States like New York, Pennsylvania, Arizona, South Carolina, Florida, Kansas, Minnesota, and Missouri each have 100% phone coverage, ranging from 5 to 7 total locations per state.
US Foods POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.