There are 27 U.S. Energy locations in the United States of America as of April 18, 2026. The state or territory with the most U.S. Energy locations is Wisconsin, with 12 sites, accounting for roughly 44.4% of the total.


U.S. Energy operates 27 United States of America locations across 8 states. Largest clusters are in Wisconsin, Texas, and SouthCarolina; the top 10 states contain 100.0% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Indiana, Iowa, and Nevada.

U.S. Energy operates 27 locations across eight states in the United States, with Wisconsin holding the largest share at 44.4% (12 locations). The top three states—Wisconsin, Texas, and South Carolina—account for 77.8% of all locations. Wisconsin offers the best access with the lowest population per location (490,177), while Indiana, Texas, and Michigan are the most stretched markets, each serving over 5 million people per location. All locations are distributed within these eight states, covering 100% of U.S. Energy's footprint.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Dane, Milwaukee, Brown, Tarrant, and Edgefield. The top 10 cities account for 74.1% of U.S. sites.

U.S. Energy operates 27 locations across the United States, with 74.1% concentrated in the top 10 cities. Dane, Wisconsin leads with 4 locations, followed by Milwaukee and Brown, Wisconsin, each with 3. Several cities in Texas and South Carolina have multiple locations, while others like Clark, Nevada, and Cheboygan, Michigan host a single site.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple U.S. Energy locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. U.S. Energy operates a total of 27 nationwide.

The complete dataset of U.S. Energy locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

U.S. Energy has 27 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for U.S. Energy locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how U.S. Energy is operating from different prespectives.

U.S. Energy's state land area data for the United States highlights Texas as the largest state with 695,668 km², while Indiana is the smallest at 94,331 km². Wisconsin has the highest number of locations at 12, despite a smaller area of 169,636 km². South Carolina's land area data is unavailable, though it has 4 locations. Other notable states include Michigan with 250,486 km² and 2 locations, and Nevada with 286,224 km² and 1 location.

U.S. Energy operates exclusively open businesses across eight states in the United States, with no closures reported. Wisconsin leads with 12 open locations, followed by Texas with 5 and South Carolina with 4. Each state listed maintains a 100% open rate, indicating full operational status for all locations.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward U.S. Energy. Using ratings and review totals from 27 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

The table for U.S. Energy in the United States of America lists Alabama, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, and Nevada as the top states by average rating, though no rating values are available. Wisconsin leads in the number of reviews with five, while Alabama, Indiana, Iowa, and Michigan have zero reviews each.
The table for U.S. Energy shows Wisconsin leading in total reviews with 5, while Alabama, Indiana, Iowa, and Michigan each have zero reviews. Average rating data is not available for these states. Wisconsin stands out as the only state with recorded customer feedback.

U.S. Energy achieves full phone coverage in all listed states, with 100% of locations equipped. Wisconsin leads with 12 out of 12 sites covered, followed by Texas with 5 out of 5. Each of the other six states, including South Carolina and Michigan, also report complete phone availability at all their locations.
U.S. Energy POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.