There are 30 Triad Technologies locations in the United States of America as of April 18, 2026. The state or territory with the most Triad Technologies locations is Ohio, with 25 sites, accounting for roughly 83.3% of the total.


Triad Technologies operates 30 United States of America locations across 4 states. Largest clusters are in Ohio, Indiana, and Michigan; the top 10 states contain 100.0% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Indiana, Michigan, and Illinois.

Triad Technologies operates 30 locations across the United States, with a dominant 83.3% (25 locations) in Ohio, where each location serves approximately 471,000 people. Indiana and Michigan each have 2 locations, representing 6.7%, but with much higher populations per location at 3.39 million and 5.03 million respectively. Illinois has a single location covering over 12.75 million people, marking it as the most stretched state in terms of population per location. The top three states combined account for 96.7% of all locations.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Cuyahoga, Hamilton, Elkhart, Lucas, and Montgomery. The top 10 cities account for 56.7% of U.S. sites.

Triad Technologies operates 30 locations across the United States, with 56.7% concentrated in the top 10 cities. Cuyahoga and Hamilton, both in Ohio, lead with 3 locations each. Several Ohio cities, including Elkhart, Lucas, and Montgomery, also host multiple locations, highlighting a regional focus.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Triad Technologies locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Triad Technologies operates a total of 30 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Triad Technologies locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Triad Technologies has 30 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Triad Technologies locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Triad Technologies is operating from different prespectives.

Triad Technologies operates in several U.S. states with varying land areas. Michigan is the largest state by land area at approximately 250,486 km², while Indiana is the smallest at about 94,331 km². Ohio has the highest number of locations with 25, despite being smaller than Michigan and Illinois. Illinois has the fewest locations, with just one site.

Triad Technologies operates in four U.S. states with a total of 30 locations. Ohio has the largest presence with 25 locations, 92% of which are open. Indiana, Michigan, and Illinois each have fully open operations, with 2, 2, and 1 locations respectively.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Triad Technologies. Using ratings and review totals from 30 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Triad Technologies has the highest average rating of 5.0 in Michigan, followed by Illinois and Ohio at 4.8, and Indiana at 4.6. Ohio leads in review volume with 1,348 reviews, while Michigan has 102, Indiana 37, and Illinois only 4 reviews. Michigan stands out with the top average rating despite fewer reviews compared to Ohio.
Triad Technologies received the highest number of reviews from Ohio, totaling 1,348, followed by Michigan with 102 reviews. Michigan had the highest average rating at a perfect 5.0, while Illinois and Ohio both had strong average ratings of 4.8. Indiana also showed a solid average rating of 4.6 with 37 reviews.

Triad Technologies has complete phone coverage in all listed states within the United States of America. Ohio leads with 25 locations all equipped with phones, followed by Indiana and Michigan with 2 each, and Illinois with 1. Each state shows 100% phone availability across its locations.
Triad Technologies POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.