There are 199 Thermo Fisher Scientific locations in the United States of America as of February 15, 2026. The state or territory with the most Thermo Fisher Scientific locations is California, with 31 sites, accounting for roughly 15.6% of the total.


Thermo Fisher Scientific operates 199 United States of America locations across 36 states. Largest clusters are in California, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania; the top 10 states contain 62.8% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Hawaii, Nevada, and Virginia.

Thermo Fisher Scientific shows strong visitor engagement: 0 locations are above the mean traffic score (mean: 50.71) and 0 qualify as highly visited.
Thermo Fisher Scientific operates 199 locations across the United States, with California hosting the highest number at 31 (15.6% of total). Massachusetts and Pennsylvania follow with 21 (10.6%) and 13 (6.5%) locations respectively, making the top three states account for 32.7% of all sites. The top ten states collectively hold 62.8% of the locations, with Massachusetts, Utah, and Wisconsin offering the best population access per location. Conversely, Virginia, Alabama, and Florida have the highest population per location, indicating more stretched coverage.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Middlesex, Cache, SantaClara, Norfolk, and SanDiego. The top 10 cities account for 26.6% of U.S. sites.

Thermo Fisher Scientific has 199 locations across the United States, with the top 10 cities accounting for 26.6% of these. Middlesex, Massachusetts leads with 12 locations, followed by Cache, Utah with 7, and Santa Clara, California with 6. Several cities in California and Massachusetts also feature prominently, including Norfolk, San Diego, and Alameda. The remaining top cities each have between 3 and 5 locations.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Thermo Fisher Scientific locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Thermo Fisher Scientific operates a total of 199 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Thermo Fisher Scientific locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Thermo Fisher Scientific has 199 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Thermo Fisher Scientific locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Thermo Fisher Scientific is operating from different prespectives.

Thermo Fisher Scientific has the highest number of locations in California, with 31 sites across 423,965 km². Texas is the largest state by land area at 695,668 km², hosting 11 locations. Massachusetts, the smallest state listed at 27,335 km², has 21 locations. Several states, including North Carolina, New Jersey, and New York, have missing area data despite having multiple locations.

Thermo Fisher Scientific has a high business open rate across several U.S. states, with California leading at 93.5% open (29 out of 31). Massachusetts and Pennsylvania also show strong open percentages of 85.7% and 92.3%, respectively. Notably, Utah has all 7 of its locations open, while New York and Wisconsin have the lowest open rates at 62.5%.
This view compares activity near Thermo Fisher Scientific locations across states. Using traffic scores observed around 199 sites, it highlights the busiest markets, states with a high share of above-average locations, and areas where activity is comparatively light. Use it to benchmark performance, prioritize field operations, and spot expansion or optimization opportunities.

Thermo Fisher Scientific's busiest location in the United States is in Utah, where 12.5% of its 8 total locations are classified as busy. All other states, including California with 31 locations and Massachusetts with 21, report no busy locations. This makes Utah the only state with any busy locations for the brand.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Thermo Fisher Scientific. Using ratings and review totals from 199 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Thermo Fisher Scientific's highest average ratings in the United States are in Maryland and New Jersey, both at 4.5, followed by North Carolina at 4.4. California, while ranking fourth in average rating at 4.3, leads in the number of reviews with 161. North Carolina and Pennsylvania also have significant review counts, with 122 and 108 respectively.
Thermo Fisher Scientific's highest average ratings in the United States are in Maryland and New Jersey, both at 4.5, followed by North Carolina at 4.4. California leads in total reviews with 161, with North Carolina and Pennsylvania also having significant review counts of 122 and 108 respectively. Texas and Massachusetts appear in the top rankings for average rating and review volume, respectively.

Thermo Fisher Scientific achieved full phone coverage in all listed states across the United States. California had the highest total count with 31 locations, all reached by phone. Other states such as Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Texas, and North Carolina also reported 100% phone coverage, with totals ranging from 7 to 21 locations. Each state listed maintained a perfect phone contact rate of 100%.
Thermo Fisher Scientific POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.