There are 25 The Macomb Group locations in the United States of America as of April 18, 2026. The state or territory with the most The Macomb Group locations is Ohio, with 8 sites, accounting for roughly 32.0% of the total.


The Macomb Group operates 25 United States of America locations across 7 states. Largest clusters are in Ohio, Michigan, and NorthCarolina; the top 10 states contain 100.0% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Kentucky, Tennessee, and SouthCarolina.

The Macomb Group operates 25 locations across seven states in the United States, with Ohio and Michigan leading at 8 (32%) and 7 (28%) locations respectively. The top three states account for 72% of all locations, while all seven states comprise 100%. Michigan offers the best access with one location per approximately 1.44 million people, whereas Tennessee is the most stretched with one location per about 3.46 million people.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Allen, Bay, Butler, Carroll, and Chester. The top 10 cities account for 40.0% of U.S. sites.

The Macomb Group operates 25 locations across the United States, with 40% concentrated in its top 10 cities. Each of these leading cities, including Allen (Ohio), Bay (Michigan), and Carroll (Kentucky), hosts a single location. Notably, Ohio features prominently with multiple cities represented among the top locations.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple The Macomb Group locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. The Macomb Group operates a total of 25 nationwide.

The complete dataset of The Macomb Group locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

The Macomb Group has 25 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for The Macomb Group locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how The Macomb Group is operating from different prespectives.

The Macomb Group's data on state land areas in the United States highlights Michigan as the largest state with 250,486 km², while Indiana is the smallest at 94,331 km². Ohio has the highest location count with 8, despite being the third largest state at 116,098 km². Some states like North Carolina and South Carolina have unspecified land areas but show fewer locations.

The Macomb Group operates across seven states in the United States, with a total of 25 locations. Michigan, North Carolina, Kentucky, Indiana, Tennessee, and South Carolina each have a 100% open rate, while Ohio has 87.5% of its 8 locations open. No closed locations are reported in any state.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward The Macomb Group. Using ratings and review totals from 25 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

The Macomb Group's highest average ratings are in Indiana and Kentucky, both with a perfect 5.0 score. Michigan follows with an average rating of 4.7, while Tennessee and Ohio have ratings of 4.5 and 4.4, respectively. Ohio leads in the number of reviews with 101, followed by Michigan with 77 reviews.
The Macomb Group's highest average ratings are in Indiana and Kentucky, both at a perfect 5.0, followed by Michigan with 4.7. Ohio leads in total reviews with 101, trailed by Michigan with 77 and North Carolina with 23. Despite fewer reviews, Kentucky maintains a top average rating of 5.0.

The Macomb Group achieves full phone coverage across all its locations in seven states within the United States. Ohio leads with 8 out of 8 sites having phone access, followed by Michigan with 7 out of 7. Each of the remaining states—North Carolina, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee, and South Carolina—also report 100% phone coverage at their respective sites.
The Macomb Group POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.