There are 599 Sylvan Learning locations in the United States of America as of February 15, 2026. The state or territory with the most Sylvan Learning locations is Texas, with 73 sites, accounting for roughly 12.2% of the total.


Sylvan Learning operates 599 United States of America locations across 49 states. Largest clusters are in Texas, California, and Florida; the top 10 states contain 60.3% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Maine, Vermont, and WestVirginia.

Sylvan Learning shows strong visitor engagement: 16 locations are above the mean traffic score (mean: 33.59) and 6 qualify as highly visited.
Sylvan Learning operates 599 locations across the United States, with Texas leading at 73 locations (12.2%), followed by California with 67 (11.2%) and Florida with 43 (7.2%), collectively accounting for 30.6% of all sites. The top 10 states hold 60.3% of locations, including North Carolina, Ohio, and Washington, the latter having the best access with 248,018 people per location. Conversely, Wisconsin, Arkansas, and Massachusetts are the most stretched, each exceeding 1.3 million people per location.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as LosAngeles, Harris, King, Cook, and Maricopa. The top 10 cities account for 13.9% of U.S. sites.

Sylvan Learning operates 599 locations across the United States, with the top 10 cities accounting for 13.9% of all sites. Los Angeles, California leads with 22 locations, followed by Harris, Texas with 10. Other notable cities include King, Washington with 8 locations and Cook, Illinois and Maricopa, Arizona each with 7. Texas has the most cities in the top 10, including Harris, Bexar, Collin, and Dallas.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Sylvan Learning locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Sylvan Learning operates a total of 599 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Sylvan Learning locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Sylvan Learning has 599 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Sylvan Learning locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Sylvan Learning is operating from different prespectives.

Sylvan Learning has the most locations in Texas, which also has the largest land area of 695,668 km² among the top states. California follows with 67 locations and an area of 423,965 km². Indiana has the smallest land area at 94,331 km² among the listed states, hosting 18 locations. Some states like North Carolina and New York have location counts but missing land area data.

Sylvan Learning's business status across ten U.S. states shows a majority of locations remain open. Ohio leads with the highest open percentage at 93.5% (29 open out of 31 total), closely followed by Indiana at 94.4%. Illinois has the lowest open rate at 60.0%, with 12 open and 8 closed centers. Texas has the largest total number of locations at 73, with 86.3% currently open.
This view compares activity near Sylvan Learning locations across states. Using traffic scores observed around 599 sites, it highlights the busiest markets, states with a high share of above-average locations, and areas where activity is comparatively light. Use it to benchmark performance, prioritize field operations, and spot expansion or optimization opportunities.

Sylvan Learning's busiest locations in the United States show Indiana with the highest busy rate at 11.1% (2 of 18 locations). California and Texas each have 2 busy locations, representing 3.0% and 2.7% of their totals respectively. Other states like New York, Illinois, and Michigan have a single busy location, with percentages ranging from 4.8% to 5.3%.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Sylvan Learning. Using ratings and review totals from 599 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Sylvan Learning's highest average ratings are in North Carolina and Washington, both at 4.9, followed closely by California, Florida, and Illinois at 4.8. Texas leads in review volume with 4,338 reviews, while California, Florida, Washington, and North Carolina also have substantial review counts ranging from 2,106 to 3,889.
Sylvan Learning's highest average ratings are in North Carolina and Washington, both at 4.9, followed by California, Florida, and Illinois at 4.8. Texas leads in total reviews with 4,338, closely followed by California with 3,889 reviews. Florida, Washington, and North Carolina also have substantial review counts, ranging from 2,106 to 2,320.

Sylvan Learning has full phone coverage across all locations in the United States. Texas leads with 73 centers, followed by California with 67 and Florida with 43, each achieving 100% phone availability. Other states like North Carolina, Ohio, and Washington also maintain complete phone coverage for their respective centers.
Sylvan Learning POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.