There are 29 Starting Strength Gyms locations in the United States of America as of January 12, 2026. The state or territory with the most Starting Strength Gyms locations is Texas, with 7 sites, accounting for roughly 24.1% of the total.


Starting Strength Gyms operates 29 United States of America locations across 17 states. Largest clusters are in Texas, Colorado, and Florida; the top 10 states contain 75.9% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee.

Starting Strength Gyms shows strong visitor engagement: 11 locations are above the mean traffic score (mean: 39.43) and 1 qualify as highly visited.
Starting Strength Gyms has 29 locations across the United States, with Texas leading at 7 locations, representing 24.1% of the total. The top three states—Texas, Colorado, and Florida—account for 44.8% of all locations, while the top ten states cover 75.9%. Idaho offers the best access with the lowest population per location at 927,054, whereas Pennsylvania, Illinois, and Ohio have the highest populations per location, indicating more stretched coverage.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Ada, Harris, Travis, Butler, and Bexar. The top 10 cities account for 44.8% of U.S. sites.

Starting Strength Gyms operates 29 locations across the United States, with the top 10 cities accounting for 44.8% of all locations. Ada, Idaho, and Harris and Travis counties in Texas each host two locations, making them the highest concentration areas. The remaining top cities, including Butler, Ohio, and Dallas, Texas, have a single location each. This distribution highlights a notable presence in Texas across multiple counties.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Starting Strength Gyms locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Starting Strength Gyms operates a total of 29 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Starting Strength Gyms locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Starting Strength Gyms has 29 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Starting Strength Gyms locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Starting Strength Gyms is operating from different prespectives.

Starting Strength Gyms has the most locations in Texas, which is also the largest state by land area at 695,668 km² with 7 locations. Colorado and Florida each have 3 locations, with areas of 269,605 km² and 184,934 km² respectively. Indiana is the smallest state listed, covering 94,331 km², and has just 1 gym location.

Starting Strength Gyms operates 22 locations across 10 states in the USA, with Texas hosting the most at 7 gyms, all currently open. Colorado and Idaho each have 3 and 2 gyms respectively, all fully operational. Florida and Oklahoma show some closures, with 1 closed gym each, resulting in open rates of 66.7% and 50.0% respectively. All other states listed maintain a 100% open rate for their single gym locations.
This view compares activity near Starting Strength Gyms locations across states. Using traffic scores observed around 29 sites, it highlights the busiest markets, states with a high share of above-average locations, and areas where activity is comparatively light. Use it to benchmark performance, prioritize field operations, and spot expansion or optimization opportunities.

Starting Strength Gyms has the highest number of busy locations in Texas, with 2 out of 7 gyms busy, representing 28.6%. Ohio and Nebraska each have a single gym that is busy, accounting for 100% of their locations. Oklahoma and Idaho both report 50% busy rates, while Alabama, Florida, Indiana, and Tennessee have no busy gyms.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Starting Strength Gyms. Using ratings and review totals from 29 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Starting Strength Gyms received perfect average ratings of 5.0 in Alabama, Florida, Idaho, Indiana, and Nebraska. Texas led in review volume with 609 reviews, followed by Indiana with 210 and Florida with 171. Notably, Indiana ranks high both in average rating and number of reviews.
Starting Strength Gyms has the highest number of reviews in Texas with 609, followed by Indiana with 210 and Florida with 171. Indiana is notable for both its high review count and a perfect average rating of 5.0, a rating shared by Alabama, Florida, Idaho, and Nebraska. Ohio and Colorado also contribute significantly with 139 and 127 reviews respectively.

Starting Strength Gyms has full phone coverage across all its locations in the United States. Texas leads with 7 gyms, all reachable by phone, followed by Colorado and Florida, each with 3 fully covered gyms. The remaining states, including Idaho, Oklahoma, Alabama, Indiana, Nebraska, Ohio, and Tennessee, each have 1 or 2 gyms with 100% phone availability.
Starting Strength Gyms POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.