There are 355 Sanford Health locations in the United States of America as of January 12, 2026. The state or territory with the most Sanford Health locations is NorthDakota, with 117 sites, accounting for roughly 33.0% of the total.


Sanford Health operates 355 United States of America locations across 12 states. Largest clusters are in NorthDakota, SouthDakota, and Minnesota; the top 10 states contain 99.4% of sites. Coverage is thinner in NewYork, Oklahoma, and Oregon.

Sanford Health shows strong visitor engagement: 33 locations are above the mean traffic score (mean: 43.74) and 11 qualify as highly visited.
Sanford Health has a total of 355 locations across the United States, with the majority concentrated in North Dakota (117 locations, 33.0%), South Dakota (112 locations, 31.5%), and Minnesota (104 locations, 29.3%), collectively accounting for 93.8% of all locations. Minnesota offers the best access with one location per 54,762 people, while California is the most stretched state, having only one location serving over 39 million people. The top 10 states represent 99.4% of Sanford Health's locations nationwide.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Minnehaha, Cass, Burleigh, Beltrami, and Lincoln. The top 10 cities account for 57.2% of U.S. sites.

Sanford Health operates a total of 355 locations across the United States. The top 10 cities account for 57.2% of all locations, with Minnehaha, South Dakota leading at 59 locations. Cass, North Dakota follows with 48 locations, while Burleigh, North Dakota has 26. The remaining top cities each have between 6 and 22 locations.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Sanford Health locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Sanford Health operates a total of 355 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Sanford Health locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Sanford Health has 355 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Sanford Health locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Sanford Health is operating from different prespectives.

Sanford Health has the highest number of locations in North Dakota (117) and South Dakota (112), though their land areas are unspecified. Minnesota, with an area of 225,182 km², hosts 104 locations, while Iowa has 14 locations across 145,746 km². California is the largest state by area at 423,965 km² but contains only one Sanford Health location, whereas Maine is the smallest state by area at 91,633 km², also with a single location.

Sanford Health operates predominantly in North Dakota, South Dakota, and Minnesota, with open facility percentages of 88.9%, 90.2%, and 81.7%, respectively. North Dakota has the highest total locations at 117, while South Dakota and Minnesota follow with 112 and 104. Some states, including Mississippi, Nebraska, California, and Oregon, report 100% open status but only have a single location each. New York and Oklahoma show minimal presence, with New York having no open locations and Oklahoma having one closed location.
This view compares activity near Sanford Health locations across states. Using traffic scores observed around 355 sites, it highlights the busiest markets, states with a high share of above-average locations, and areas where activity is comparatively light. Use it to benchmark performance, prioritize field operations, and spot expansion or optimization opportunities.

Sanford Health's busiest locations by state show North Dakota with the highest number of busy sites at 7 out of 117 (6.0%). Minnesota and South Dakota follow with 5 busy locations each, representing 4.8% and 4.5% of their totals respectively. Notably, Oregon and New York each have a single location that is 100% busy. Several states, including California, Mississippi, Nebraska, and Oklahoma, report no busy locations despite having one site each.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Sanford Health. Using ratings and review totals from 355 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Sanford Health's highest average ratings are in Mississippi and Oklahoma, both at a perfect 5.0, followed by California at 4.4 and New York at 4.3. Nebraska's average rating is not available. The most reviews come from South Dakota with 1,203, North Dakota with 1,125, and Minnesota with 320, indicating strong patient engagement in these states.
Sanford Health's highest average ratings come from Mississippi and Oklahoma, both at a perfect 5.0, followed by California at 4.4 and New York at 4.3. South Dakota leads in total reviews with 1,203, closely followed by North Dakota with 1,125 reviews. Minnesota, Oregon, and Iowa have significantly fewer reviews, ranging from 34 to 320. Nebraska's average rating data is not available.

Sanford Health has complete phone coverage across all listed locations in the United States, with 100% of facilities having phones. The highest counts are in North Dakota (117), South Dakota (112), and Minnesota (104). Several states, including California, Mississippi, Nebraska, New York, Oklahoma, and Oregon, each have a single facility, all with phone coverage.
Sanford Health POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.