There are 20 Ruan locations in the United States of America as of January 26, 2026. The state or territory with the most Ruan locations is Indiana, with 3 sites, accounting for roughly 15.0% of the total.


Ruan operates 20 United States of America locations across 13 states. Largest clusters are in Indiana, Minnesota, and Arizona; the top 10 states contain 85.0% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Pennsylvania, Washington, and Wisconsin.

Ruan operates 20 locations across the United States, with Indiana and Minnesota leading at three locations each, representing 15% apiece. The top three states account for 40% of all locations, while the top ten states cover 85%. Iowa offers the best access with one location per 1.59 million people, whereas Pennsylvania is the most stretched, with one location per nearly 13 million residents.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Maricopa, Hennepin, Christian, Allen, and Cook. The top 10 cities account for 60.0% of U.S. sites.

Ruan operates 20 locations across the United States, with 60% concentrated in the top 10 cities. Maricopa, Arizona, and Hennepin, Minnesota, lead with two locations each. The remaining top cities each host a single location, reflecting a broad geographic distribution.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Ruan locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Ruan operates a total of 20 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Ruan locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Ruan has 20 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Ruan locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Ruan is operating from different prespectives.

Ruan operates in multiple U.S. states with Indiana having the smallest land area at approximately 94,331 km² and Arizona the largest at about 295,220 km². Both Indiana and Minnesota have three locations each, while Arizona and Iowa have two locations. Other states like Missouri, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Michigan, and Ohio have one or two locations with land areas ranging from roughly 94,331 km² to 250,486 km².

In the United States, Ruan operates varying numbers of businesses across states, with total locations ranging from 1 to 3 per state. Arizona, Georgia, Washington, Illinois, and Kansas each have 100% of their Ruan businesses open, while Minnesota has the lowest open percentage at 33.3%. Indiana leads in open locations with 2 out of 3 businesses active, and Michigan has no open or closed locations reported.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Ruan. Using ratings and review totals from 20 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Ruan's highest average rating in the United States is in Kansas, with a perfect score of 5.0. Michigan and Minnesota follow with average ratings of 4.3 and 4.1, respectively. Minnesota also leads in review volume, contributing 160 reviews, while Iowa and Arizona have 46 and 35 reviews, respectively. Indiana and Missouri both have an average rating of 3.7, with Indiana providing 32 reviews.
Ruan's highest average rating is in Kansas at a perfect 5.0, followed by Michigan with 4.3 and Minnesota with 4.1. Minnesota also leads in total reviews, contributing 160, significantly more than the next highest, Iowa, with 46 reviews. Indiana appears in both top lists, with an average rating of 3.7 and 32 reviews.

Ruan's phone coverage in the United States shows full coverage across all listed states, with 100% of phones accounted for in each. Indiana and Minnesota each have 3 phones, the highest totals, followed by Arizona, Iowa, and Missouri with 2 phones each. The remaining states—Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Michigan, and Washington—each have 1 phone, all with complete coverage.
Ruan POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.