There are 11 Razorback Moving locations in the United States of America as of January 27, 2026. The state or territory with the most Razorback Moving locations is Arkansas, with 4 sites, accounting for roughly 36.4% of the total.


Razorback Moving operates 11 United States of America locations across 4 states. Largest clusters are in Arkansas, Florida, and Oklahoma; the top 10 states contain 100.0% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Florida, Oklahoma, and Missouri.

Razorback Moving operates 11 locations across four states in the United States. Arkansas and Florida each host four locations, accounting for 36.4% of the total each, while Oklahoma has two locations (18.2%) and Missouri one (9.1%). Arkansas offers the best access with one location per 754,667 people, whereas Missouri is the most stretched with one location per 6,154,422 people. The top three states cover 90.9% of locations, with all locations contained within the top four states.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Benton, Tulsa, Hillsborough, Broward, and Jasper. The top 10 cities account for 100.0% of U.S. sites.

Razorback Moving operates 11 locations across the United States, with the top 10 cities accounting for 100% of its presence. Benton, Arkansas, leads with 3 locations, followed by Tulsa, Oklahoma, with 2. The remaining cities each have a single location, including multiple cities in Florida and Arkansas.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Razorback Moving locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Razorback Moving operates a total of 11 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Razorback Moving locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Razorback Moving has 11 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Razorback Moving locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Razorback Moving is operating from different prespectives.

Razorback Moving operates in four states with varying land areas. Florida is the largest state served, covering 184,934 km² and hosting four locations. Arkansas, the smallest state in the list, spans 137,781 km² and also has four locations. Oklahoma and Missouri have smaller location counts, with two and one respectively, despite their larger land areas compared to Arkansas.

Razorback Moving operates predominantly in Florida and Arkansas, each with 3 open locations out of 4 total, reflecting a 75% open rate. Oklahoma shows a full operational status with 2 open locations and no closures. Missouri has a single listed location with no open or closed status reported.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Razorback Moving. Using ratings and review totals from 11 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Razorback Moving's highest average rating is in Oklahoma at a perfect 5.0, followed by Missouri with 4.9 and Arkansas with 4.7. Florida also has a strong average rating of 4.6. Arkansas leads in total reviews with 1,038, while Oklahoma has 305, Florida 260, and Missouri 56 reviews.
Razorback Moving's highest average rating is in Oklahoma at a perfect 5.0, followed by Missouri with 4.9. Arkansas leads in total reviews with 1,038, significantly more than Oklahoma's 305 reviews. Florida and Missouri have 260 and 56 reviews respectively, with average ratings above 4.5.

Razorback Moving has full phone coverage in all listed states within the United States of America. Arkansas, Florida, Oklahoma, and Missouri each show 100% phone availability, with Arkansas and Florida having four locations each, Oklahoma two, and Missouri one. This indicates consistent phone accessibility across their service areas.
Razorback Moving POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.