There are 38 Quick Weight Loss Centers locations in the United States of America as of January 12, 2026. The state or territory with the most Quick Weight Loss Centers locations is Texas, with 22 sites, accounting for roughly 57.9% of the total.


Quick Weight Loss Centers operates 38 United States of America locations across 3 states. Largest clusters are in Texas, Florida, and Illinois; the top 10 states contain 100.0% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Texas, Florida, and Illinois.

Quick Weight Loss Centers operates 38 locations across three states in the United States, with Texas hosting the majority at 22 locations (57.9%). Florida follows with 15 locations (39.5%), while Illinois has a single location (2.6%). Illinois shows the highest population per location at 12,757,634, indicating the most stretched access, whereas Texas offers the best access with one location per 1,329,243 people.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Harris, Broward, Travis, Miami-Dade, and FortBend. The top 10 cities account for 86.8% of U.S. sites.

Quick Weight Loss Centers operates 38 locations across the United States, with 86.8% concentrated in the top 10 cities. Harris, Texas, leads with 10 locations, followed by Broward, Florida, and Travis, Texas, each with 4 locations. Other notable cities include Miami-Dade and Fort Bend in Texas, hosting 3 locations each.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Quick Weight Loss Centers locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Quick Weight Loss Centers operates a total of 38 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Quick Weight Loss Centers locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Quick Weight Loss Centers has 38 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Quick Weight Loss Centers locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Quick Weight Loss Centers is operating from different prespectives.

Quick Weight Loss Centers has the most locations in Texas, which is also the largest state by land area at approximately 695,668 km², hosting 22 locations. Florida follows with 15 locations and an area of about 184,934 km². Illinois, the smallest among the top states at roughly 149,995 km², has only one location.

Quick Weight Loss Centers in the United States shows a majority of closed locations, with Texas having all 22 centers closed and Florida closing 13 out of 15. Illinois is the only state with an open center, maintaining a 100% open rate for its single location. Overall, open centers are rare across these states.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Quick Weight Loss Centers. Using ratings and review totals from 38 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Quick Weight Loss Centers has the highest average rating in Texas at 4.5, followed by Florida with an average rating of 4.4. Illinois shows no available average rating. Texas also leads in review volume with 326 reviews, while Florida has 243 reviews and Illinois has none.
Quick Weight Loss Centers received the highest number of reviews in Texas with 326, followed by Florida with 243 reviews. Texas also had the highest average rating of 4.5, closely followed by Florida at 4.4. Illinois showed zero reviews and did not have an available average rating.

Quick Weight Loss Centers have full phone coverage in all listed states in the United States. Texas leads with 22 centers, all equipped with phone access. Florida follows with 15 centers, each having phone coverage. Illinois has one center, also fully covered by phone.
Quick Weight Loss Centers POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.