There are 170 Parker-Hannifin Corporation locations in the United States of America as of February 15, 2026. The state or territory with the most Parker-Hannifin Corporation locations is Ohio, with 15 sites, accounting for roughly 8.8% of the total.


Parker-Hannifin Corporation operates 170 United States of America locations across 38 states. Largest clusters are in Ohio, Texas, and California; the top 10 states contain 52.9% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Alaska, Idaho, and Oklahoma.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation shows strong visitor engagement: 3 locations are above the mean traffic score (mean: 51.05) and 1 qualify as highly visited.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation operates 170 locations across the United States, with Ohio and Texas each hosting the highest count at 15 locations (8.8% each). The top three states account for 24.1% of all locations, while the top ten states represent 52.9%. Nebraska, Alaska, and Ohio offer the best population access per location, with fewer residents per site, whereas Florida, Virginia, and Oklahoma have the highest population per location, indicating more stretched coverage.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Allegan, Middlesex, Cook, Beaufort, and Kanawha. The top 10 cities account for 13.5% of U.S. sites.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation operates 170 locations across the United States. The top three cities—Allegan (Michigan), Middlesex (Massachusetts), and Cook (Illinois)—each host three locations. An additional seven cities have two locations each, collectively accounting for 13.5% of the total U.S. locations.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Parker-Hannifin Corporation locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Parker-Hannifin Corporation operates a total of 170 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Parker-Hannifin Corporation locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation has 170 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Parker-Hannifin Corporation locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Parker-Hannifin Corporation is operating from different prespectives.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation has locations in multiple U.S. states, with Ohio and Texas each hosting 15 sites. Texas is the largest state by land area among these, covering 695,668 km², while Massachusetts is the smallest at 27,335 km². California follows with 11 locations and a land area of 423,965 km². Some states, like North Carolina and New York, have location counts but missing area data.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation has the highest proportion of open businesses in Michigan, with all 7 locations operational. California follows with a 90.9% open rate, having 10 out of 11 businesses open. Ohio and New York each maintain over 80% open status, while North Carolina shows the lowest percentage at 60% open among its 10 businesses. Texas has 11 open and 4 closed locations, representing a 73.3% open rate.
This view compares activity near Parker-Hannifin Corporation locations across states. Using traffic scores observed around 170 sites, it highlights the busiest markets, states with a high share of above-average locations, and areas where activity is comparatively light. Use it to benchmark performance, prioritize field operations, and spot expansion or optimization opportunities.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation has busy locations in Illinois, Ohio, and Tennessee, with Tennessee having the highest percentage of busy sites at 16.7% (1 out of 6). Illinois follows with 14.3% busy locations (1 out of 7), while Ohio has 6.7% (1 out of 15). All other listed states, including California and Texas, report no busy locations.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Parker-Hannifin Corporation. Using ratings and review totals from 170 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation's highest average rating is in Michigan at 4.5, followed by North Carolina and Tennessee, both at 4.4. Illinois and Pennsylvania have average ratings of 4.2. Ohio leads in the number of reviews with 88, while Michigan and California follow with 74 and 65 reviews respectively.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation's highest average rating comes from Michigan at 4.5, followed by North Carolina and Tennessee both at 4.4. Ohio leads in total reviews with 88, while Michigan and California follow with 74 and 65 reviews respectively. Tennessee and Texas round out the top five states by review count. Illinois and Pennsylvania also show strong average ratings of 4.2.

Parker-Hannifin Corporation achieved full phone coverage in all listed states across the United States. Ohio and Texas each had the highest number of locations with phones, totaling 15 out of 15. California followed with 11 out of 11, while North Carolina had 10 out of 10. All other states, including Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, New York, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee, also reported 100% phone coverage.
Parker-Hannifin Corporation POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.