There are 31 Our House Senior Living locations in the United States of America as of June 02, 2026. The state or territory with the most Our House Senior Living locations is Wisconsin, with 28 sites, accounting for roughly 90.3% of the total.


Our House Senior Living operates 31 United States of America locations across 2 states. Largest clusters are in Wisconsin and Minnesota; the top 10 states contain 100.0% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Wisconsin and Minnesota.

Our House Senior Living operates 31 locations across the United States, with 90.3% (28 locations) in Wisconsin and 9.7% (3 locations) in Minnesota. Wisconsin offers the best access with one location per 210,076 people, while Minnesota is the most stretched, serving one location per 1,898,431 people. The top two states account for 100% of the brand's locations.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Columbia, Sauk, Mower, Barron, and Chippewa. The top 10 cities account for 77.4% of U.S. sites.

Our House Senior Living operates 31 locations across the United States, with 77.4% concentrated in the top 10 cities. Columbia, Wisconsin, leads with 6 locations, followed by Sauk, Wisconsin, and Mower, Minnesota, each hosting 3 locations. Several other Wisconsin cities, including Barron, Chippewa, Rock, Wood, and Richland, each have 2 locations.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Our House Senior Living locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Our House Senior Living operates a total of 31 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Our House Senior Living locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Our House Senior Living has 31 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Our House Senior Living locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Our House Senior Living is operating from different prespectives.

For Our House Senior Living in the United States, Minnesota is the largest state by land area at approximately 225,182 km², hosting 3 locations. Wisconsin, with a smaller land area of about 169,636 km², has the highest number of locations at 28. These two states represent the extremes in both area and location count for the brand.

Our House Senior Living operates 28 locations in Wisconsin, with 24 open and none closed, representing an 85.7% open rate. In Minnesota, all 3 locations are open, reflecting a 100% open status.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Our House Senior Living. Using ratings and review totals from 31 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Our House Senior Living has the highest average rating in Wisconsin at 4.9, followed by Minnesota with an average rating of 4.7. Wisconsin also leads in the number of reviews, totaling 848, while Minnesota has 110 reviews.
Our House Senior Living received the highest number of reviews in Wisconsin with 848, followed by Minnesota with 110 reviews. Wisconsin also leads in average rating at 4.9, while Minnesota holds a strong average rating of 4.7. These states represent the top performers in both review volume and customer satisfaction for the brand in the United States.

Our House Senior Living achieves full phone coverage in Wisconsin and Minnesota, with 28 of 28 locations and 3 of 3 locations having phone access, respectively. Both states report a 100% phone coverage rate for the brand.
Our House Senior Living POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.