There are 52 Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife locations in the United States of America as of April 18, 2026. The state or territory with the most Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife locations is Oregon, with 52 sites, accounting for roughly 100.0% of the total.


Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife operates 52 United States of America locations across 1 states. Largest clusters are in Oregon; the top 10 states contain 100.0% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Oregon.

The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife operates 52 locations exclusively in Oregon, accounting for 100% of its total presence in the United States. Oregon leads both in location count and population served per location, with an average of 81,334 people per site. This state represents the entire top three and top ten shares for the brand's locations.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Clatsop, Morrow, Lane, Multnomah, and Wallowa. The top 10 cities account for 57.7% of U.S. sites.

The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife has 52 locations across the United States, with 57.7% concentrated in its top 10 cities. Clatsop, Oregon leads with 6 locations, followed by Morrow with 4. Several cities including Lane, Multnomah, Wallowa, and Union each have 3 locations, while Klamath, Lake, Lincoln, and Benton each host 2.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife operates a total of 52 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife has 52 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife is operating from different prespectives.

The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife reports Oregon as the state with the largest land area, covering approximately 254,799 km². Oregon is also the smallest state listed, indicating it is the sole state in this dataset. There are 52 locations accounted for within Oregon.

The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife in Oregon has 49 locations open and 1 closed, resulting in a 94.2% open rate. Out of a total of 52 sites, the vast majority remain operational.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. Using ratings and review totals from 52 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife has its highest average rating of 4.4 in Oregon. This state also leads in the number of reviews, totaling 3,653. No other states are listed with comparable data.
The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife received the highest number of reviews from Oregon, totaling 3,653. Oregon also recorded the highest average rating of 4.4 among all states.

The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife provides complete phone coverage in Oregon, with all 52 locations equipped with phone access. This represents 100% coverage within the state.
Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.