There are 29 Oakmont Senior Living locations in the United States of America as of June 02, 2026. The state or territory with the most Oakmont Senior Living locations is California, with 27 sites, accounting for roughly 93.1% of the total.


Oakmont Senior Living operates 29 United States of America locations across 2 states. Largest clusters are in California and Nevada; the top 10 states contain 100.0% of sites. Coverage is thinner in California and Nevada.

Oakmont Senior Living operates 29 locations across the United States, with 93.1% (27 locations) situated in California and the remaining 6.9% (2 locations) in Nevada. California offers the best access with one location per approximately 1.46 million residents, while Nevada is the most stretched with one location per about 1.55 million residents. All locations are concentrated within these two states.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as LosAngeles, Clark, SantaClara, Orange, and Sacramento. The top 10 cities account for 72.4% of U.S. sites.

Oakmont Senior Living operates 29 locations in the United States, with 72.4% concentrated in the top 10 cities. Los Angeles, California, leads with 5 locations, followed by several California cities including Clark, Santa Clara, Orange, and Sacramento, each hosting 2 locations. The majority of locations are clustered in California, highlighting the brand's regional focus.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Oakmont Senior Living locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Oakmont Senior Living operates a total of 29 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Oakmont Senior Living locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Oakmont Senior Living has 29 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Oakmont Senior Living locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Oakmont Senior Living is operating from different prespectives.

Oakmont Senior Living has the most locations in California, which also ranks as the largest state by land area at 423,965 km², with 27 locations. Nevada, the smallest state listed by land area at 286,224 km², has only 2 Oakmont locations.

Oakmont Senior Living has a total of 29 locations in the United States, with 27 in California and 2 in Nevada. None of these locations are currently open, resulting in a 0% open rate across both states.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Oakmont Senior Living. Using ratings and review totals from 29 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Oakmont Senior Living has its highest average ratings in California and Nevada, with scores of 4.4 and 4.3 respectively. California also leads in review volume, totaling 943, followed by Nevada with 128 reviews. These states represent the brand's strongest markets by both rating and engagement.
Oakmont Senior Living has the highest number of reviews in California with 943, followed by Nevada with 128 reviews. California also leads in average rating at 4.4, while Nevada has a close average rating of 4.3. These two states represent the top locations for both review volume and customer satisfaction for the brand in the United States.

Oakmont Senior Living has full phone coverage in all its locations within the United States of America. Both California and Nevada show 100% phone availability, with 27 out of 27 locations in California and 2 out of 2 locations in Nevada equipped with phones.
Oakmont Senior Living POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.