There are 30 NEFCO locations in the United States of America as of April 18, 2026. The state or territory with the most NEFCO locations is Massachusetts, with 3 sites, accounting for roughly 10.0% of the total.


NEFCO operates 30 United States of America locations across 18 states. Largest clusters are in Massachusetts, Texas, and Washington; the top 10 states contain 73.3% of sites. Coverage is thinner in NorthCarolina, Pennsylvania, and Vermont.

NEFCO has 30 locations across the United States, with Massachusetts, Texas, and Washington each hosting 3 locations, accounting for 30% of the total. The top 10 states combined hold 73.3% of NEFCO's locations. Vermont, Idaho, and Montana have the best access with the lowest population per location, while Florida, Pennsylvania, and Texas are the most stretched states with the highest population per location.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Norfolk, Albany, Benton, Bernalillo, and Ada. The top 10 cities account for 36.7% of U.S. sites.

NEFCO operates 30 locations across the United States, with the top 10 cities accounting for 36.7% of these sites. Norfolk, Massachusetts, leads with 2 locations, while nine other cities each host a single location. This distribution highlights a relatively even spread across various states.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple NEFCO locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. NEFCO operates a total of 30 nationwide.

The complete dataset of NEFCO locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

NEFCO has 30 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for NEFCO locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how NEFCO is operating from different prespectives.

NEFCO's locations in the United States span multiple states with Texas having the largest land area at 695,668 km² and Massachusetts the smallest at 27,335 km². Texas, Massachusetts, and Washington each host three locations, while most other states have one or two. Notably, New York's land area data is unavailable.

NEFCO operates a total of 23 business locations across 10 U.S. states, with 21 currently open and 2 closed. Washington, Texas, New York, Kentucky, Ohio, Idaho, Virginia, Oregon, and Connecticut each maintain a 100% open rate, while Massachusetts has the highest closure rate with one out of three locations closed, resulting in a 66.7% open percentage.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward NEFCO. Using ratings and review totals from 30 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

In the United States, NEFCO's highest average rating of 5.0 is in Kentucky, followed by Virginia at 4.5 and New York at 4.4. Idaho and Oregon have no available average rating data. Ohio leads in the number of reviews with 20, while New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Virginia each have between 6 and 10 reviews.
For the brand NEFCO in the United States, Ohio leads with the highest number of reviews at 20, followed by New York with 10 reviews. Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Virginia each have 6 reviews. Among states with available average ratings, Kentucky stands out with a perfect 5.0, while Virginia and New York have ratings of 4.5 and 4.4 respectively.

NEFCO achieved full phone coverage in all listed states across the United States of America. Coverage reached 100% in Massachusetts, Texas, and Washington, each with 3 phones out of 3 total. States like Idaho, Kentucky, New York, Ohio, Oregon, and Virginia had 2 phones each, all fully covered. Connecticut also showed complete coverage with 1 phone out of 1 total.
NEFCO POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.