There are 113 Mark-Taylor Residential locations in the United States of America as of February 16, 2026. The state or territory with the most Mark-Taylor Residential locations is Arizona, with 110 sites, accounting for roughly 97.3% of the total.


Mark-Taylor Residential operates 113 United States of America locations across 2 states. Largest clusters are in Arizona and Nevada; the top 10 states contain 100.0% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Arizona and Nevada.

Mark-Taylor Residential operates 113 locations in the United States, with 97.3% (110) situated in Arizona and the remaining 2.7% (3) in Nevada. Arizona offers the best access with one location per 65,203 people, while Nevada is the most stretched, averaging one location per 1,033,754 people. The top two states account for 100% of the brand’s locations.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Maricopa, Clark, and Pinal. The top 10 cities account for 100.0% of U.S. sites.

Mark-Taylor Residential operates a total of 113 locations in the United States. The vast majority, 107 locations, are concentrated in Maricopa, Arizona. Clark, Nevada, and Pinal, Arizona, each have 3 locations. The top 10 cities account for 100% of the brand's locations.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Mark-Taylor Residential locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Mark-Taylor Residential operates a total of 113 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Mark-Taylor Residential locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Mark-Taylor Residential has 113 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Mark-Taylor Residential locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Mark-Taylor Residential is operating from different prespectives.

Mark-Taylor Residential's properties in the United States are primarily located in Arizona and Nevada. Arizona has the largest land area at approximately 295,220 km² with 110 locations, while Nevada covers about 286,224 km² but has only 3 locations. Arizona represents the brand's largest state land area, and Nevada is the smallest by area among the top states listed.

Mark-Taylor Residential operates exclusively open businesses in the United States, with 110 open locations in Arizona and 3 open locations in Nevada. Both states report a 100% open status, with no closed businesses recorded. Arizona has the highest total number of locations at 110.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Mark-Taylor Residential. Using ratings and review totals from 113 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Mark-Taylor Residential has the highest average ratings in Arizona and Nevada, with scores of 4.4 and 4.3 respectively. Arizona also leads in the number of reviews, totaling 14,725, while Nevada has 346 reviews. These states represent the strongest customer feedback for the brand in the United States.
Mark-Taylor Residential received the highest number of reviews in Arizona, totaling 14,725, followed by Nevada with 346 reviews. Arizona also had the highest average rating at 4.4, while Nevada's average rating was slightly lower at 4.3. These two states lead in both review volume and average ratings for the brand in the United States.

Mark-Taylor Residential achieved full phone coverage in Arizona and Nevada, with 110 out of 110 and 3 out of 3 properties having phone access, respectively. Both states show a 100% phone coverage rate for the brand in the United States of America.
Mark-Taylor Residential POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.