There are 969 M&T Bank locations in the United States of America as of February 15, 2026. The state or territory with the most M&T Bank locations is NewYork, with 266 sites, accounting for roughly 27.5% of the total.


M&T Bank operates 969 United States of America locations across 13 states. Largest clusters are in NewYork, Maryland, and Connecticut; the top 10 states contain 97.2% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Maine, DistrictofColumbia, and WestVirginia.

M&T Bank shows strong visitor engagement: 72 locations are above the mean traffic score (mean: 47.21) and 18 qualify as highly visited.
M&T Bank has a total of 969 locations across the United States, with New York holding the largest share at 27.5% (266 locations). The top three states—New York, Maryland, and Connecticut—account for 57.8% of all locations, while the top ten states cover 97.2%. Vermont offers the best access with the lowest population per location at 17,400, whereas Virginia is the most stretched, with one location serving 359,355 people.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Baltimore, Fairfield, Erie, Suffolk, and Hartford. The top 10 cities account for 34.4% of U.S. sites.

M&T Bank operates 969 locations across the United States, with its top 10 cities accounting for 34.4% of all branches. Baltimore, Maryland, leads with 53 locations, followed by Fairfield, Connecticut, with 48. Notable concentrations also appear in Erie, New York (43), and Suffolk, New York (37).
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple M&T Bank locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. M&T Bank operates a total of 969 nationwide.

The complete dataset of M&T Bank locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

M&T Bank has 969 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for M&T Bank locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how M&T Bank is operating from different prespectives.

M&T Bank has the highest number of locations in New York with 266, though its land area is unspecified. Pennsylvania is the largest state by area among the listed states at 119,279 km², while Delaware is the smallest at 6,446 km². Maryland and Connecticut follow with areas of approximately 32,131 km² and 14,358 km², respectively, hosting 153 and 141 locations. Notably, some states like New Jersey and New Hampshire have location counts but no area data provided.

M&T Bank has the highest number of locations in New York with 259 open branches out of 266, reflecting a 97.4% open rate. New Jersey and Virginia both maintain a 100% open status with 64 and 24 branches respectively. Connecticut shows the lowest open percentage at 83.7%, with 118 branches open and 23 closed. Most states report over 90% of branches currently open.
This view compares activity near M&T Bank locations across states. Using traffic scores observed around 969 sites, it highlights the busiest markets, states with a high share of above-average locations, and areas where activity is comparatively light. Use it to benchmark performance, prioritize field operations, and spot expansion or optimization opportunities.

M&T Bank's busiest locations in the United States are primarily in Connecticut, with 12 busy sites representing 8.5% of its 141 locations. Maryland follows with 10 busy branches, accounting for 6.5% of its 153 total. Notably, New York has the highest number of locations at 266 but a lower busy percentage of 2.6%. Virginia has no busy locations among its 24 branches.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward M&T Bank. Using ratings and review totals from 969 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

M&T Bank's highest average ratings in the United States are 3.6, achieved by New Hampshire, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. Massachusetts and New York follow closely with average ratings of 3.5. New York leads in review volume with 3,433, while Maryland and Connecticut also have substantial numbers of 2,710 and 1,709 reviews respectively.
M&T Bank's highest average ratings are found in New Hampshire, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania, each with a 3.6 rating, followed by Massachusetts and New York at 3.5. New York leads in total reviews with 3,433, followed by Maryland with 2,710, and Connecticut with 1,709 reviews. Pennsylvania and New Jersey also contribute significantly with 1,447 and 672 reviews, respectively.

M&T Bank has full phone coverage across all its locations in the United States, with 100% of branches in each listed state equipped with phones. The highest number of phone-equipped branches is in New York, totaling 266, followed by Maryland with 153 and Connecticut with 141. Other states such as Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, and New Jersey also maintain complete phone coverage, with branch counts ranging from 24 to 130.
M&T Bank POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.