There are 62 LearningRx locations in the United States of America as of June 02, 2026. The state or territory with the most LearningRx locations is Texas, with 8 sites, accounting for roughly 12.9% of the total.


LearningRx operates 62 United States of America locations across 24 states. Largest clusters are in Texas, NewJersey, and Virginia; the top 10 states contain 72.6% of sites. Coverage is thinner in NewMexico, Oklahoma, and SouthDakota.

LearningRx operates 62 locations across the United States, with Texas hosting the highest number at 8 locations (12.9% of total). The top three states—Texas, New Jersey, and Virginia—account for 32.3% of all locations, while the top ten states represent 72.6%. Arkansas offers the best access with one location per 1,006,223 people, whereas California is the most stretched, serving over 13 million people per location.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Bergen, Fairfax, Maricopa, Hennepin, and Washington. The top 10 cities account for 32.3% of U.S. sites.

LearningRx has a total of 62 locations across the United States. The top three cities—Bergen, New Jersey; Fairfax, Virginia; and Maricopa, Arizona—each host 3 locations. The top 10 cities account for 32.3% of all locations, with other cities like Hennepin, Minnesota, and Washington, Arkansas, having 2 locations each.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple LearningRx locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. LearningRx operates a total of 62 nationwide.

The complete dataset of LearningRx locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

LearningRx has 62 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for LearningRx locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how LearningRx is operating from different prespectives.

LearningRx locations in the United States are distributed across states with varying land areas. Texas, the largest state listed, spans approximately 695,668 km² and hosts 8 locations. Tennessee, the smallest by land area among these, covers about 109,116 km² with 4 locations. Notably, New Jersey's land area data is unavailable despite having 6 locations.

LearningRx has the highest number of total locations in Texas with 8 centers, 75% of which are open. Virginia shows the highest open percentage at 83.3% among its 6 locations. New Jersey has an equal split between open and closed centers, each at 3 out of 6. Arkansas and California have the lowest open percentage, both at 33.3%, with 3 total locations each.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward LearningRx. Using ratings and review totals from 62 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

LearningRx achieved perfect average ratings of 5.0 in Arizona, Arkansas, California, Florida, and Minnesota. Minnesota led in review volume with 192 reviews, followed by Virginia with 104 and California with 90. Tennessee and Wisconsin also contributed significant review counts, with 86 and 62 respectively.
LearningRx received perfect average ratings of 5.0 in Arizona, Arkansas, California, Florida, and Minnesota. Minnesota leads in total reviews with 192, followed by Virginia with 104 and California with 90. Tennessee and Wisconsin also have notable review counts at 86 and 62, respectively.

LearningRx achieved full phone coverage in all listed states, with each state showing 100% of locations having phone access. Texas leads with 8 locations, followed by New Jersey and Virginia with 6 each. Minnesota has 5 locations, while Florida and Tennessee each have 4. Arizona, Arkansas, California, and Wisconsin each have 3 locations, all fully covered by phone.
LearningRx POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.