There are 42 JDRF locations in the United States of America as of June 02, 2026. The state or territory with the most JDRF locations is Florida, with 5 sites, accounting for roughly 11.9% of the total.


JDRF operates 42 United States of America locations across 25 states. Largest clusters are in Florida, California, and NewYork; the top 10 states contain 61.9% of sites. Coverage is thinner in NorthCarolina, Utah, and Washington.

JDRF has 42 locations across the United States, with Florida leading at 5 locations (11.9% share). California, New York, and South Carolina each have 3 locations, representing 7.1% apiece. The top three states account for 26.2% of all locations, while the top ten states cover 61.9%. Iowa offers the best access with one location per 1.59 million people, whereas Texas is the most stretched, serving over 14.6 million people per location.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Richland, PalmBeach, Allegheny, Allen, and Broward. The top 10 cities account for 28.6% of U.S. sites.

JDRF has a total of 42 locations across the United States. The top 10 cities account for 28.6% of these locations, with Richland, South Carolina, and Palm Beach, Florida, each hosting 2 locations. The remaining top cities, such as Allegheny, Pennsylvania, and Dallas, Texas, have 1 location each.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple JDRF locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. JDRF operates a total of 42 nationwide.

The complete dataset of JDRF locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

JDRF has 42 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for JDRF locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how JDRF is operating from different prespectives.

JDRF's top states by land area include Texas, the largest at 695,668 km², and Tennessee, the smallest at 109,116 km². Florida and California have 5 and 3 locations respectively, with areas of approximately 184,934 km² and 423,965 km². Several states such as New York and South Carolina have location counts but missing area data.

JDRF's business locations in the United States show varied open-to-closed ratios across states. South Carolina, Iowa, Texas, and Ohio each have 100% of their sites open, while Pennsylvania and Wisconsin have no open locations. Florida has the highest number of total sites at five, with 60% open. New York and California both have two-thirds of their three sites open, and New Jersey shows an equal split between open and closed.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward JDRF. Using ratings and review totals from 42 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

JDRF's highest average ratings in the United States are 5.0 in California and Florida, followed by 4.0 in Iowa and New Jersey. Iowa leads in review count with 7, while California has 4 reviews. Wisconsin, Florida, and New Jersey have between 2 and 3 reviews each. New York's average rating data is unavailable.
JDRF's highest average ratings of 5.0 were recorded in California and Florida. Iowa and New Jersey followed with average ratings of 4.0, while New York's average rating was not available. Iowa led in total reviews with 7, followed by California with 4 and Wisconsin with 3 reviews. Florida and New Jersey each contributed 2 reviews.

JDRF achieved full phone coverage in all listed states across the United States, with 100% of locations having phone access. Florida had the highest number of covered locations at five, while California, New York, South Carolina each had three. Several states, including Iowa, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Wisconsin, maintained complete coverage with two locations each.
JDRF POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.