There are 3,768 InterContinental Hotels Group locations in the United States of America as of January 26, 2026. The state or territory with the most InterContinental Hotels Group locations is Texas, with 480 sites, accounting for roughly 12.7% of the total.


InterContinental Hotels Group operates 3,768 United States of America locations across 51 states. Largest clusters are in Texas, Florida, and California; the top 10 states contain 49.8% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Hawaii, RhodeIsland, and Vermont.

InterContinental Hotels Group shows strong visitor engagement: 0 locations are above the mean traffic score (mean: 49.57) and 0 qualify as highly visited.
InterContinental Hotels Group operates 3,768 locations across the United States, with Texas leading at 480 locations (12.7% of total). The top three states—Texas, Florida, and California—account for 24.5% of all locations, while the top ten states represent nearly half (49.8%). Wyoming, Nebraska, and Oklahoma have the best access to locations, with the lowest population per hotel, whereas Hawaii, California, and Alaska are the most stretched markets with the highest population per location.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Harris, Bexar, Cook, Dallas, and Maricopa. The top 10 cities account for 8.0% of U.S. sites.

InterContinental Hotels Group has a total of 3,768 locations in the United States. The top 10 cities account for 8.0% of these locations, with Harris, Texas leading at 63 sites. Other notable cities include Bexar, Texas and Cook, Illinois, each with 34 locations, and Dallas, Texas with 29. Texas dominates the list, hosting six of the top ten cities by location count.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple InterContinental Hotels Group locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. InterContinental Hotels Group operates a total of 3768 nationwide.

The complete dataset of InterContinental Hotels Group locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

InterContinental Hotels Group has 3768 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for InterContinental Hotels Group locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how InterContinental Hotels Group is operating from different prespectives.

InterContinental Hotels Group has the highest number of locations in Texas, which also has the largest land area among the listed states at approximately 695,668 km² and 480 locations. Virginia, with the smallest land area of about 110,786 km², hosts 126 locations. Other notable states include Florida with 241 locations across 184,934 km² and California with 204 locations over 423,965 km². Some states like North Carolina and New York have location counts but no available land area data.

InterContinental Hotels Group has the highest number of open locations in Texas with 446 out of 480 total, reflecting a 92.9% open rate. California shows the highest open percentage at 93.6% with 191 open hotels from 204 total. Florida and Michigan also maintain strong open rates above 91%, while New York has the lowest open percentage at 85.0% with 108 open hotels out of 127. Overall, most states report over 85% of their hotels as open.
This view compares activity near InterContinental Hotels Group locations across states. Using traffic scores observed around 3,768 sites, it highlights the busiest markets, states with a high share of above-average locations, and areas where activity is comparatively light. Use it to benchmark performance, prioritize field operations, and spot expansion or optimization opportunities.

InterContinental Hotels Group has one busy location in New York, representing 0.8% of its 127 total locations in the state. In contrast, California, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Virginia each have zero busy locations despite having between 119 and 480 total locations. New York is the only state with a busy site among the ten listed.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward InterContinental Hotels Group. Using ratings and review totals from 3,768 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

InterContinental Hotels Group's average ratings in the United States are highest in California, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, and New York, each with an average rating of 4.1. Texas leads in the number of reviews with 242,475, followed by Florida with 221,348 and California with 154,085. Georgia and New York also have significant review counts of 97,103 and 92,171, respectively.
InterContinental Hotels Group's highest average ratings of 4.1 are consistent across California, Florida, Georgia, Michigan, and New York. Texas leads in total reviews with 242,475, followed by Florida with 221,348 and California with 154,085. Georgia and New York also contribute significant review volumes, at 97,103 and 92,171 respectively.

InterContinental Hotels Group has full phone coverage across all listed states in the United States, with 100% of properties having phone access. Texas leads with 480 locations, followed by Florida with 241 and California with 204. Each of the top ten states, including Georgia, Ohio, and New York, maintains complete phone availability for their properties.
InterContinental Hotels Group POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.