There are 2,006 Greyhound locations in the United States of America as of January 26, 2026. The state or territory with the most Greyhound locations is Texas, with 186 sites, accounting for roughly 9.3% of the total.


Greyhound operates 2,006 United States of America locations across 50 states. Largest clusters are in Texas, California, and Pennsylvania; the top 10 states contain 44.8% of sites. Coverage is thinner in RhodeIsland, Alaska, and DistrictofColumbia.

Greyhound shows strong visitor engagement: 463 locations are above the mean traffic score (mean: 45.4) and 166 qualify as highly visited.
Greyhound has a total of 2,006 locations across the United States, with Texas leading at 186 locations (9.3% of total). California and Pennsylvania follow with 127 (6.3%) and 90 (4.5%) locations respectively, making the top three states account for 20.1% of all locations. The top ten states represent 44.8% of the brand's locations, with Oregon and Minnesota having notably low population per location ratios of 57,937 and 78,018 respectively. Vermont offers the best access with a population per location of 24,762, while Virginia is among the most stretched states, with 410,691 people per location.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Yavapai, Monterey, Yuma, LosAngeles, and Navajo. The top 10 cities account for 4.9% of U.S. sites.

Greyhound operates a total of 2,006 locations across the United States. The top city by location count is Yavapai, Arizona, with 16 locations, followed by Monterey, California, and Yuma, Arizona, each with 11 locations. The top 10 cities collectively account for 4.9% of all Greyhound locations nationwide.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Greyhound locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Greyhound operates a total of 2006 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Greyhound locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Greyhound has 2006 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Greyhound locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Greyhound is operating from different prespectives.

Greyhound's locations in the United States are distributed across states varying widely in land area. Texas, the largest state listed at approximately 695,668 km², hosts the highest number of locations at 186. In contrast, Pennsylvania, the smallest state in the dataset at about 119,279 km², has 90 locations. Notably, New York's land area data is unavailable, though it has 87 locations.

Greyhound's business status across ten U.S. states shows varied open-to-closed ratios. Minnesota has the highest open percentage at 87.7% with 64 open locations out of 73 total. Michigan has the lowest open rate at 29.2%, with only 21 open out of 72. Texas leads in total locations with 186, maintaining a 77.4% open rate.
This view compares activity near Greyhound locations across states. Using traffic scores observed around 2,006 sites, it highlights the busiest markets, states with a high share of above-average locations, and areas where activity is comparatively light. Use it to benchmark performance, prioritize field operations, and spot expansion or optimization opportunities.

Greyhound's busiest locations in the United States show notable variation by state. Texas leads with 26 busy locations, accounting for 14.0% of its 186 total sites. Minnesota has the highest proportion of busy locations at 17.8% with 13 busy out of 73 total. Michigan has the fewest busy locations both in number (3) and percentage (4.2%) among the listed states.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Greyhound. Using ratings and review totals from 2,006 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Greyhound's highest average ratings are in Michigan at 3.8, followed by Minnesota and New York, both at 3.7. Arizona and Utah have average ratings of 3.5. Texas leads in review volume with 28,464 reviews, while California and New York follow with 15,833 and 13,811 reviews respectively.
Greyhound's highest average ratings come from Michigan (3.8), Minnesota (3.7), and New York (3.7). Texas leads in total reviews with 28,464, followed by California with 15,833 and New York with 13,811 reviews. Pennsylvania and Arizona also contribute notable review volumes, with 10,899 and 3,498 respectively. Arizona is among both the top states by average rating (3.5) and review count.

Greyhound's phone coverage in the United States shows full coverage across the top ten states listed, with each state having 100% of locations equipped with phones. Texas leads with 186 phone-equipped locations, followed by California with 127 and Pennsylvania with 90. All ten states, including New York, Minnesota, and Oregon, report complete phone availability at their respective locations.
Greyhound POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.