There are 117 Greif locations in the United States of America as of February 16, 2026. The state or territory with the most Greif locations is Ohio, with 14 sites, accounting for roughly 12.0% of the total.


Greif operates 117 United States of America locations across 30 states. Largest clusters are in Ohio, Georgia, and California; the top 10 states contain 67.5% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Utah.

Greif shows strong visitor engagement: 1 locations are above the mean traffic score (mean: 48.14) and 0 qualify as highly visited.
Greif operates 117 locations across the United States, with Ohio hosting the highest count at 14 locations (12.0% of total), followed by Georgia with 12 locations (10.3%). The top three states account for 30.8% of all locations, while the top ten states represent 67.5%. Ohio, Georgia, and Kentucky have the best access based on population per location, whereas Arizona, Missouri, and Colorado are the most stretched markets with populations exceeding 5.7 million per location.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Cobb, Harris, Hamilton, Cook, and SantaClara. The top 10 cities account for 23.9% of U.S. sites.

Greif operates 117 locations across the United States, with the top 10 cities accounting for 23.9% of these sites. Cobb, Georgia, and Harris, Texas, lead with four locations each. Several cities, including Hamilton and Stark in Ohio, and Cook in Illinois, host three locations each, while others like Boone, Kentucky, and Los Angeles, California, have two locations.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Greif locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Greif operates a total of 117 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Greif locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Greif has 117 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Greif locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Greif is operating from different prespectives.

Greif's locations in the United States are spread across multiple states, with Texas having the largest land area at approximately 695,668 km² and Kentucky the smallest at about 104,651 km². Ohio hosts the highest number of Greif locations, totaling 14, despite having a smaller area of 116,098 km². Georgia and California also have significant land areas, 153,905 km² and 423,965 km² respectively, with 12 and 10 locations each. Notably, North Carolina's land area data is unavailable, though it has 7 Greif locations.

In the United States, Greif has the highest number of open businesses in Ohio, with 13 out of 14 locations open, representing 92.9%. Michigan, Pennsylvania, Kentucky, and Wisconsin show a 100% open rate, with no closed locations. Illinois has the lowest open percentage at 55.6%, with 5 open and 3 closed out of 9 total. Other states like North Carolina and Georgia maintain high open rates above 80%.
This view compares activity near Greif locations across states. Using traffic scores observed around 117 sites, it highlights the busiest markets, states with a high share of above-average locations, and areas where activity is comparatively light. Use it to benchmark performance, prioritize field operations, and spot expansion or optimization opportunities.

In the United States, Greif's busiest locations are distributed across several states, with Wisconsin having the highest proportion of busy sites at 25% (1 out of 4). Texas follows with 10% busy locations, accounting for 1 out of 10 total sites. Other states, including California, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, show no busy locations among their total sites.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Greif. Using ratings and review totals from 117 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Greif's highest average ratings in the United States are found in Texas and Wisconsin, both with a 4.2 rating. Pennsylvania follows with 3.9, while California and Kentucky have lower averages of 3.7 and 3.4, respectively. Ohio leads in the number of reviews at 305, with Kentucky and Illinois also contributing significant review counts of 198 and 139.
Greif's highest average ratings in the United States are in Texas and Wisconsin, both at 4.2, followed by Pennsylvania at 3.9. Ohio leads in total reviews with 305, significantly ahead of Kentucky's 198 and Illinois' 139. California appears in both lists, ranking fifth in reviews with 78 and fourth in average rating at 3.7. Kentucky has a notable contrast with a high review count of 198 but a relatively lower average rating of 3.4.

Greif achieved full phone coverage in all listed states within the United States, with each state showing 100% coverage. Ohio had the highest number of locations with phones at 14, followed by Georgia with 12 and California and Texas each with 10. All ten states reported complete phone availability across their total locations.
Greif POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.