Distribution of GLS Locations Across United States of America by State

GLS operates 27 United States of America locations across 8 states. Largest clusters are in California, Nevada, and Washington; the top 10 states contain 100.0% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Idaho, Utah, and Wisconsin.

Top 10 States with the most number of GLS locations in United States of America

GLS shows strong visitor engagement: 2 locations are above the mean traffic score (mean: 34.86) and 2 qualify as highly visited.

GLS operates 27 locations across eight states in the United States, with California hosting the majority at 15 locations, accounting for 55.6% of the total. The top three states—California, Nevada, and Washington—represent 77.8% of all locations. Nevada offers the best access with one location per 1,033,754 residents, while Wisconsin, Colorado, and Arizona have the highest population per location, indicating more stretched coverage. All GLS locations are distributed within these eight states.

GLS per capita insights

• States (Nevada, Idaho, Washington) enjoy the best per capita access to GLS.
• States like Arizona, Colorado, Utah, Wisconsin, despite their large number of locations, are under-served on a per-person basis, signaling potential demand for suburban expansion.
• Several states strike a balance between population growth and GLS density, making them hotspots for sustained competition.

Cities With the Most GLS Locations in the United States of America

Locations concentrate around major metros such as LosAngeles, Clark, Alameda, Adams, and Franklin. The top 10 cities account for 51.9% of U.S. sites.

Top 10 Cities Ranked by Location Count

GLS operates 27 locations across the United States, with over half (51.9%) concentrated in its top 10 cities. Los Angeles, California, leads with 3 locations, followed by Clark, Nevada, and Alameda, California, each hosting 2 locations. The remaining cities, including Adams, Colorado, and Franklin, Washington, have a single location each.

Street-level hotspots (busiest streets with multiple GLS)

Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple GLS locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. GLS operates a total of 27 nationwide.

Download GLS Outlets Points of Interest Data

The complete dataset of GLS locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Key Variables for GLS Points of Interests

GLS has 27 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for GLS locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how GLS is operating from different prespectives.

Average Area Covered Per GLS Locations (By State)

GLS operates in several U.S. states with California having the largest land area at approximately 423,965 km² and hosting 15 locations. Wisconsin, the smallest state by area among GLS's presence, covers about 169,636 km² with one location. Other notable states include Nevada and Washington, each with three locations and land areas of roughly 286,224 km² and 184,668 km², respectively.

Business Status of GLS Locations (Open vs Closed)

In the United States, GLS has a total of 29 locations across eight states, with California hosting the most at 15 sites. California also has the highest number of closed locations at 3, resulting in an 80% open rate. Arizona, Utah, Colorado, Idaho, and Wisconsin each maintain a 100% open status with no closures. Nevada and Washington both show a 66.7% open rate, with 2 open and 1 closed location each.

Traffic Data for GLS Locations (By State)

This view compares activity near GLS locations across states. Using traffic scores observed around 27 sites, it highlights the busiest markets, states with a high share of above-average locations, and areas where activity is comparatively light. Use it to benchmark performance, prioritize field operations, and spot expansion or optimization opportunities.

What GLS locations are busy in top 10 states?

GLS has the highest number of busy locations in California with 2 out of 15, representing 13.3%. Arizona shows the highest percentage of busy locations at 50.0%, with 1 busy site out of 2 total. Nevada follows with 33.3% busy locations, while Colorado, Idaho, Utah, Washington, and Wisconsin report no busy locations.

Customer Reviews and Ratings of GLS Locations

This section summarizes customer sentiment toward GLS. Using ratings and review totals from 27 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Average Ratings

GLS has the highest average rating in Wisconsin at 3.6, while California and Washington both have an average rating of 2.1. Colorado and Idaho share the lowest average rating of 1.5. California leads in review volume with 2,298 reviews, followed by Washington with 325 and Arizona with 194.

Number of Reviews

GLS received the highest average rating in Wisconsin at 3.6, while California and Washington both had average ratings of 2.1. California led in total reviews with 2,298, followed by Washington with 325 and Arizona with 194. Colorado and Idaho had the lowest average ratings at 1.5, with Colorado also ranking fifth in total reviews at 85.

GLS Locations With Verified Contact Information

Contact Information

GLS phone coverage in the United States is complete in all listed states, with 100% of locations having phones. California has the highest number of phone-equipped sites at 15, followed by Nevada and Washington with 3 each. All other states have between 1 and 2 locations, all fully covered.

Use cases for GLS Points of Interests Data

Market Analysis

GLS POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.

Site Selection

For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.

Urban Planning

Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.

How this xMap's POI data can help businesses?

• Accuracy and Precision: xMap data offers high-accuracy data, which minimizes the chances of wrong decisions based on flawed information.
• Complete Data: With xMap, businesses have access to comprehensive and complete data, effectively filling any knowledge gaps and providing a well-rounded view for decision making.
• Up-to-Date Information: xMap ensures that the data provided is regularly updated, which allows businesses to make dynamic, timely decisions in tune with current trends and situations.
• Scalability: xMap data allows businesses to scale their operations efficiently, by providing insights that cater to varying business sizes and requirements.
• Analytical Power: Utilizing xMap data's analytics can help identify patterns and trends, thus enhancing strategic planning and foresight for businesses.