There are 50 Get In Shape For Women locations in the United States of America as of January 11, 2026. The state or territory with the most Get In Shape For Women locations is Massachusetts, with 38 sites, accounting for roughly 76.0% of the total.


Get In Shape For Women operates 50 United States of America locations across 10 states. Largest clusters are in Massachusetts, NewJersey, and Florida; the top 10 states contain 100.0% of sites. Coverage is thinner in NewHampshire, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee.

Get In Shape For Women shows strong visitor engagement: 0 locations are above the mean traffic score (mean: 40.14) and 0 qualify as highly visited.
Get In Shape For Women operates 50 locations across the United States, with 76% (38 locations) concentrated in Massachusetts. The top three states account for 86% of all locations, while the top ten cover 100%. Massachusetts offers the best access with one location per 183,795 people, whereas California is the most stretched, serving over 39 million people per location.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Middlesex, Norfolk, Plymouth, Essex, and Bergen. The top 10 cities account for 86.0% of U.S. sites.

Get In Shape For Women has 50 locations in the United States, with 86% concentrated in the top 10 cities. Middlesex, Massachusetts, leads with 17 locations, followed by Norfolk, Massachusetts, with 8. Other notable cities include Plymouth and Essex in Massachusetts, while Bergen, New Jersey, and Broward, Florida, have fewer locations.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Get In Shape For Women locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Get In Shape For Women operates a total of 50 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Get In Shape For Women locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Get In Shape For Women has 50 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Get In Shape For Women locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Get In Shape For Women is operating from different prespectives.

Get In Shape For Women has the most locations in Massachusetts, which has the smallest land area among the listed states at 27,335 km² with 38 locations. California, the largest state by area at 423,965 km², has only one location. Other states like Florida and Arizona have large land areas but few locations, indicating a concentration of locations in smaller states.

Get In Shape For Women has the largest presence in Massachusetts with 38 locations, where 39.5% (15) remain open and 21 are closed. New Jersey shows a higher open rate at 66.7% with 2 out of 3 locations open. Several states including New Hampshire, California, Illinois, and Tennessee each have a single location fully operational, while Arizona, Pennsylvania, and Minnesota have only closed locations. Florida has 2 locations, evenly split between open and closed.
This view compares activity near Get In Shape For Women locations across states. Using traffic scores observed around 50 sites, it highlights the busiest markets, states with a high share of above-average locations, and areas where activity is comparatively light. Use it to benchmark performance, prioritize field operations, and spot expansion or optimization opportunities.

Get In Shape For Women locations in New Jersey show the highest activity, with 1 out of 3 locations (33.3%) marked as busy. All other states, including Massachusetts with 38 locations, report zero busy locations. This indicates a notable concentration of busy sites exclusively in New Jersey among the listed states.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Get In Shape For Women. Using ratings and review totals from 50 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Get In Shape For Women has perfect average ratings of 5.0 in Florida, Minnesota, New Hampshire, and New Jersey, while Arizona's average rating is not available. Massachusetts leads in review volume with 428 reviews, followed by New Jersey with 45 and Illinois with 30. California and Pennsylvania each have 13 reviews.
Get In Shape For Women received the highest number of reviews from Massachusetts with 428 total reviews, followed by New Jersey with 45. Other notable states by review count include Illinois (30), California (13), and Pennsylvania (13). Among states with average ratings, Florida, Minnesota, New Hampshire, and New Jersey each have a perfect average rating of 5.0. Arizona's average rating data is unavailable.

Get In Shape For Women has complete phone coverage across all listed states in the United States, with 100% of locations having phone access. Massachusetts leads with 38 locations, while New Jersey has 3, Florida 2, and the remaining states each have 1 location. This consistent 100% phone coverage highlights uniform accessibility across the brand's presence.
Get In Shape For Women POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.