Distribution of Frontier Management Locations Across United States of America by State

Frontier Management operates 28 United States of America locations across 10 states. Largest clusters are in Texas, Washington, and Arizona; the top 10 states contain 100.0% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Georgia, Nebraska, and Nevada.

Top 10 States with the most number of Frontier Management locations in United States of America

Frontier Management operates 28 locations across the United States, with Texas hosting the largest share at 28.6% (8 locations). The top three states—Texas, Washington, and Arizona—account for 53.6% of all locations. Washington, Nebraska, and Oregon have the best access with the lowest population per location, while California, Georgia, and Illinois are the most stretched, each serving over 4 million people per location. All listed states collectively represent 100% of Frontier Management's locations.

Frontier Management per capita insights

• States (Washington, Nebraska, Oregon) enjoy the best per capita access to Frontier Management.
• States like Texas, California, Illinois, Tennessee, Georgia, despite their large number of locations, are under-served on a per-person basis, signaling potential demand for suburban expansion.
• Several states strike a balance between population growth and Frontier Management density, making them hotspots for sustained competition.

Cities With the Most Frontier Management Locations in the United States of America

Locations concentrate around major metros such as Dallas, Cook, Pima, Sacramento, and Shelby. The top 10 cities account for 57.1% of U.S. sites.

Top 10 Cities Ranked by Location Count

Frontier Management operates 28 locations across the United States, with the top 10 cities accounting for 57.1% of these. Six cities each host 2 locations, including Dallas and Harris in Texas, while four cities have a single location. This distribution highlights a moderate concentration of Frontier Management's presence in select urban areas.

Street-level hotspots (busiest streets with multiple Frontier Management)

Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Frontier Management locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Frontier Management operates a total of 28 nationwide.

Download Frontier Management Outlets Points of Interest Data

The complete dataset of Frontier Management locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Key Variables for Frontier Management Points of Interests

Frontier Management has 28 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Frontier Management locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Frontier Management is operating from different prespectives.

Average Area Covered Per Frontier Management Locations (By State)

Frontier Management's top states by land area include Texas, the largest at 695,668 km² with 8 locations, and Tennessee, the smallest at 109,116 km² with 2 locations. Other notable states are California (423,965 km²) and Arizona (295,220 km²), each hosting 3 locations. The distribution reflects a range of state sizes with varying location counts across the United States.

Business Status of Frontier Management Locations (Open vs Closed)

Frontier Management's business status across the United States shows a predominance of closed locations, with Texas having 2 closed sites and no open ones out of 8 total. Washington is the only state with open locations, featuring 2 open and 1 closed business, resulting in a 50% open rate. Several states, including Arizona, California, Illinois, and Tennessee, have only closed locations, while Oregon, Georgia, Nevada, and Nebraska report no open or closed businesses.

Customer Reviews and Ratings of Frontier Management Locations

This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Frontier Management. Using ratings and review totals from 28 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Average Ratings

Frontier Management's highest average ratings in the United States are in Illinois and Texas, both at 4.6. Arizona follows closely with a 4.5 average rating, while Georgia and California have averages of 4.4 and 4.3, respectively. Texas leads in review volume with 426 reviews, significantly more than Illinois (110) and Arizona (101). California and Washington also contribute notable review counts with 85 and 66 reviews, respectively.

Number of Reviews

Frontier Management's highest average ratings are in Illinois and Texas, both at 4.6, followed by Arizona at 4.5. Texas leads in total reviews with 426, significantly more than Illinois and Arizona, which have 110 and 101 reviews respectively. California and Washington also contribute notable review counts, with 85 and 66 reviews.

Frontier Management Locations With Verified Contact Information

Contact Information

Frontier Management achieves full phone coverage in all listed states across the United States of America. Texas leads with 8 out of 8 locations having phone access, followed by Washington with 4 out of 4. Each of the remaining states, including Arizona, California, Illinois, Oregon, Tennessee, Georgia, Nebraska, and Nevada, also report 100% phone coverage for all their locations.

Use cases for Frontier Management Points of Interests Data

Market Analysis

Frontier Management POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.

Site Selection

For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.

Urban Planning

Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.

How this xMap's POI data can help businesses?

• Accuracy and Precision: xMap data offers high-accuracy data, which minimizes the chances of wrong decisions based on flawed information.
• Complete Data: With xMap, businesses have access to comprehensive and complete data, effectively filling any knowledge gaps and providing a well-rounded view for decision making.
• Up-to-Date Information: xMap ensures that the data provided is regularly updated, which allows businesses to make dynamic, timely decisions in tune with current trends and situations.
• Scalability: xMap data allows businesses to scale their operations efficiently, by providing insights that cater to varying business sizes and requirements.
• Analytical Power: Utilizing xMap data's analytics can help identify patterns and trends, thus enhancing strategic planning and foresight for businesses.