There are 165 Fitness Together locations in the United States of America as of January 11, 2026. The state or territory with the most Fitness Together locations is Massachusetts, with 44 sites, accounting for roughly 26.7% of the total.


Fitness Together operates 165 United States of America locations across 34 states. Largest clusters are in Massachusetts, NorthCarolina, and Maryland; the top 10 states contain 66.7% of sites. Coverage is thinner in NewHampshire, SouthCarolina, and Utah.

Fitness Together shows strong visitor engagement: 39 locations are above the mean traffic score (mean: 41.85) and 12 qualify as highly visited.
Fitness Together operates 165 locations across the United States, with Massachusetts hosting the highest number at 44 locations, representing 26.7% of the total. The top three states account for 38.2% of locations, while the top ten states cover 66.7%. Massachusetts offers the best access with 158,732 people per location, contrasting sharply with Texas, where each location serves approximately 9.75 million people, indicating more stretched coverage.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Middlesex, Essex, Mecklenburg, Ada, and Knox. The top 10 cities account for 35.2% of U.S. sites.

Fitness Together has a total of 165 locations across the United States. Middlesex, Massachusetts, leads with 21 locations, followed by Essex, Massachusetts, and Mecklenburg, North Carolina, each with 6 locations. The top 10 cities account for 35.2% of all locations, highlighting a notable concentration in specific areas.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Fitness Together locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Fitness Together operates a total of 165 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Fitness Together locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Fitness Together has 165 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Fitness Together locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Fitness Together is operating from different prespectives.

Fitness Together locations in the United States show a wide range of state land areas. California is the largest state listed with 423,965 km² and 7 locations, while Massachusetts is the smallest with 27,335 km² but the highest location count at 44. Other states vary significantly in area, such as Michigan with 250,486 km² and 5 locations, and Maryland with 32,131 km² and 9 locations. North Carolina's land area data is unavailable despite having 10 locations.

Fitness Together locations in the United States show varied business status across states. Massachusetts leads with 65.9% of its 44 locations open, while Maryland has the highest open rate at 88.9% with 9 total locations. Ohio has no open locations out of 8, and New Jersey has the lowest open percentage at 20.0% among 5 locations. Several states like Wisconsin and Tennessee maintain high open rates above 80%.
This view compares activity near Fitness Together locations across states. Using traffic scores observed around 165 sites, it highlights the busiest markets, states with a high share of above-average locations, and areas where activity is comparatively light. Use it to benchmark performance, prioritize field operations, and spot expansion or optimization opportunities.

Fitness Together's busiest locations in the United States show Wisconsin with the highest busy rate at 33.3% (2 of 6 locations). Maryland follows with 22.2% busy (2 of 9), and North Carolina also has 20.0% busy (2 of 10). Massachusetts has the largest number of busy locations at 6, representing 13.6% of its 44 total locations, while Ohio has no busy locations among its 8 sites.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Fitness Together. Using ratings and review totals from 165 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Fitness Together received perfect average ratings of 5.0 in California, Florida, Maryland, New Jersey, and Ohio. Massachusetts led in review volume with 1,649 reviews, followed by Maryland with 580 and North Carolina with 471. Tennessee and Virginia also contributed notably with 466 and 315 reviews, respectively.
Fitness Together's highest average ratings of 5.0 were recorded in California, Florida, Maryland, New Jersey, and Ohio. Massachusetts led in total reviews with 1,649, followed by Maryland with 580 and North Carolina with 471. Tennessee and Virginia also contributed notable review counts, with 466 and 315 respectively.

Fitness Together has complete phone coverage across all locations in the United States states listed. Massachusetts leads with 44 locations, each having phone access. Other states such as North Carolina, Maryland, Ohio, Virginia, California, Florida, Tennessee, Wisconsin, and New Jersey also show 100% phone coverage, with location counts ranging from 5 to 10.
Fitness Together POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.