There are 1,774 FamilySearch locations in the United States of America as of June 01, 2026. The state or territory with the most FamilySearch locations is California, with 180 sites, accounting for roughly 10.1% of the total.


FamilySearch operates 1,774 United States of America locations across 50 states. Largest clusters are in California, Utah, and Texas; the top 10 states contain 47.7% of sites. Coverage is thinner in NewHampshire, Delaware, and RhodeIsland.

FamilySearch has 1,774 locations across the United States, with California leading at 180 locations (10.1% of total). The top three states—California, Utah, and Texas—account for 23.4% of all locations, while the top ten states represent 47.7%. Wyoming, Montana, and Utah offer the best access with the lowest population per location, whereas Massachusetts, Maryland, and Connecticut have the highest population per location, indicating more stretched access.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as SaltLake, Utah, LosAngeles, Maricopa, and SanBernardino. The top 10 cities account for 9.2% of U.S. sites.

FamilySearch operates 1,774 locations across the United States, with the top 10 cities accounting for 9.2% of these. Salt Lake, Utah leads with 26 locations, followed closely by Utah city in Utah with 25 and Los Angeles, California with 24. Other notable cities include Maricopa, Arizona with 18 locations and multiple California cities such as San Bernardino, Orange, Riverside, and Kern, each ranging from 10 to 15 locations.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple FamilySearch locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. FamilySearch operates a total of 1774 nationwide.

The complete dataset of FamilySearch locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

FamilySearch has 1774 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for FamilySearch locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how FamilySearch is operating from different prespectives.

FamilySearch data on U.S. state land areas shows Texas as the largest with 695,668 km², while Washington is the smallest among the listed states at 184,668 km². California has the highest location count at 180, despite being third in area size with 423,965 km². Utah and Texas follow in location counts with 120 and 116 respectively. Notably, New York's area data is unavailable.

FamilySearch operates across multiple U.S. states with varying business statuses. California leads with 180 total locations, 93.3% of which are open. Arizona has the highest open percentage at 91.5% with 59 locations. Oregon shows the lowest open rate at 75.0% among these states, with 64 total locations.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward FamilySearch. Using ratings and review totals from 1,774 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

FamilySearch's highest average rating is in Colorado with a perfect 5.0, followed by Utah at 4.8. Idaho, New York, and Texas each have an average rating of 4.7. Utah leads in review volume with 200 reviews, while Texas and California follow with 53 and 51 reviews respectively.
FamilySearch received the highest average rating of 5.0 in Colorado, followed by Utah with 4.8. Utah also led in total reviews, contributing 200, significantly more than Texas with 53 and California with 51. Idaho and New York both held an average rating of 4.7, while Idaho ranked fourth in review count with 43.

FamilySearch achieved full phone coverage in all listed states across the United States. California led with 180 phones, followed by Utah with 120 and Texas with 116, each at 100% coverage. Other states such as Florida, Washington, and Oregon also maintained complete phone coverage, ranging from 64 to 80 phones. Each state's total devices matched the number with phones, confirming 100% coverage consistently.
FamilySearch POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.