There are 25 Fairmont Hotels & Resorts locations in the United States of America as of January 27, 2026. The state or territory with the most Fairmont Hotels & Resorts locations is California, with 9 sites, accounting for roughly 36.0% of the total.


Fairmont Hotels & Resorts operates 25 United States of America locations across 11 states. Largest clusters are in California, Arizona, and DistrictofColumbia; the top 10 states contain 96.0% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Kentucky, NewYork, and Washington.

Fairmont Hotels & Resorts shows strong visitor engagement: 0 locations are above the mean traffic score (mean: 55.57) and 0 qualify as highly visited.
Fairmont Hotels & Resorts has 25 locations across the United States, with California hosting the largest share at 36% (9 locations). The top three states—California, Arizona, and Hawaii—account for 52% of locations, with Hawaii offering the best population access per location at 725,294. Among states with fewer locations, Texas has the highest population per location ratio at 14,621,671, indicating more stretched access. Overall, the top 10 states cover 96% of the brand's U.S. presence.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as SanFrancisco, Allegheny, Cook, LosAngeles, and DistrictofColumbia. The top 10 cities account for 72.0% of U.S. sites.

Fairmont Hotels & Resorts operates 25 locations across the United States, with 72% concentrated in the top 10 cities. San Francisco, California leads with 3 locations, followed by several cities including Allegheny, Pennsylvania, and Los Angeles, California, each hosting 2 locations. The remaining top cities mostly have one or two locations, indicating a focused but diverse urban presence.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Fairmont Hotels & Resorts locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Fairmont Hotels & Resorts operates a total of 25 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Fairmont Hotels & Resorts locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Fairmont Hotels & Resorts has 25 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Fairmont Hotels & Resorts locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Fairmont Hotels & Resorts is operating from different prespectives.

Fairmont Hotels & Resorts has locations across multiple U.S. states, with California hosting the most at nine locations. Texas is the largest state by land area at 695,668 km², while Hawaii is the smallest at 28,412 km². Some states, such as the District of Columbia and New York, have undefined land area values but still feature Fairmont locations.

Fairmont Hotels & Resorts operates 9 locations in California, with 66.7% currently open. Arizona, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Washington each have all their Fairmont hotels open, totaling 2, 2, 2, and 1 locations respectively. Illinois and New York have only closed locations, while the District of Columbia and Hawaii show mixed statuses. Kentucky has one location listed with no open or closed status.
This view compares activity near Fairmont Hotels & Resorts locations across states. Using traffic scores observed around 25 sites, it highlights the busiest markets, states with a high share of above-average locations, and areas where activity is comparatively light. Use it to benchmark performance, prioritize field operations, and spot expansion or optimization opportunities.

Fairmont Hotels & Resorts has the highest share of busy locations in Hawaii, with 1 out of 2 properties (50%) classified as busy. In contrast, none of the hotels in California, Arizona, District of Columbia, Illinois, Kentucky, New York, Pennsylvania, Texas, or Washington are currently busy, despite California having the largest total count of 9 locations.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Fairmont Hotels & Resorts. Using ratings and review totals from 25 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Fairmont Hotels & Resorts has the highest average rating in Arizona at 4.6, followed by California and Hawaii with 4.5 each. Illinois and Texas both have average ratings of 4.4. Texas leads in the number of reviews with 12,260, closely followed by California with 11,764 reviews.
Fairmont Hotels & Resorts received the highest average ratings in Arizona (4.6), California (4.5), and Hawaii (4.5). Texas led in total reviews with 12,260, followed closely by California with 11,764 reviews. The District of Columbia and Pennsylvania also contributed notable review counts, with 1,952 and 1,374 respectively. Arizona had the fewest reviews among the top states, totaling 149.

Fairmont Hotels & Resorts has full phone coverage in all its locations across ten U.S. states. California leads with nine properties, all equipped with phones, followed by Arizona, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Pennsylvania, and Texas, each with two fully covered locations. Kentucky, New York, and Washington each have one property, also with complete phone availability. Overall, 100% phone coverage is maintained in every state listed.
Fairmont Hotels & Resorts POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.