There are 11 Face to Face Spa locations in the United States of America as of January 12, 2026. The state or territory with the most Face to Face Spa locations is Texas, with 9 sites, accounting for roughly 81.8% of the total.


Face to Face Spa operates 11 United States of America locations across 3 states. Largest clusters are in Texas, Mississippi, and Ohio; the top 10 states contain 100.0% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Texas, Mississippi, and Ohio.

Face to Face Spa operates 11 locations across three states in the United States, with Texas accounting for 9 locations or 81.8% of the total. Mississippi and Ohio each have 1 location, representing 9.1% each. Ohio has the highest population per location at 11,774,683, indicating the most stretched access, while Mississippi offers the best access with a population per location of 2,958,846. All locations are concentrated within these top three states.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Travis, Cuyahoga, FortBend, Desoto, and Harris. The top 10 cities account for 100.0% of U.S. sites.

Face to Face Spa operates 11 locations across the United States, with all sites concentrated in eight cities. Travis, Texas, leads with four locations, while seven other cities each have one location. The top 10 cities account for 100% of the brand's locations.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Face to Face Spa locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Face to Face Spa operates a total of 11 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Face to Face Spa locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Face to Face Spa has 11 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Face to Face Spa locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Face to Face Spa is operating from different prespectives.

Face to Face Spa operates in three U.S. states with Texas having the largest land area of 695,668 km² and nine locations. Mississippi covers 125,448 km² with one location, while Ohio, the smallest at 116,098 km², also has one location. Texas stands out as both the largest state by area and the one with the most spa locations.

Face to Face Spa operates exclusively open locations across three states in the United States. Texas hosts the largest number with 9 open stores, while Ohio and Mississippi each have 1 open store. There are no closed locations reported in any of these states, resulting in a 100% open rate for all.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Face to Face Spa. Using ratings and review totals from 11 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Face to Face Spa's highest average rating in the United States is 5.0 in Mississippi, followed by Ohio and Texas, both with an average rating of 4.9. Texas leads in review volume with 2,087 reviews, while Mississippi and Ohio have 107 and 91 reviews respectively. Mississippi stands out for having the top rating despite a lower review count compared to Texas.
Face to Face Spa's highest average ratings are in Mississippi (5.0), Ohio (4.9), and Texas (4.9). Texas leads in total reviews with 2,087, followed by Mississippi with 107 and Ohio with 91 reviews. These states represent the brand's strongest performance in both ratings and review volume.

Face to Face Spa has complete phone coverage in Texas, Mississippi, and Ohio, with 100% of locations in each state having phones. Texas leads with 9 locations all equipped with phones, while Mississippi and Ohio each have a single fully covered location.
Face to Face Spa POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.