There are 174 Eastwood Homes locations in the United States of America as of February 15, 2026. The state or territory with the most Eastwood Homes locations is NorthCarolina, with 75 sites, accounting for roughly 43.1% of the total.


Eastwood Homes operates 174 United States of America locations across 4 states. Largest clusters are in NorthCarolina, SouthCarolina, and Virginia; the top 10 states contain 100.0% of sites. Coverage is thinner in SouthCarolina, Virginia, and Georgia.

Eastwood Homes operates 174 locations across the United States, with 95.4% concentrated in its top three states. North Carolina leads with 75 locations (43.1%), followed by South Carolina with 54 (31.0%), and Virginia with 37 (21.3%). Virginia and Georgia have the highest population per location, at 233,095 and 1,340,291 respectively, indicating these states are the most stretched in terms of access. The top 10 states cover the brand's entire location presence.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Chesterfield, Greenville, Johnston, Mecklenburg, and Berkeley. The top 10 cities account for 52.3% of U.S. sites.

Eastwood Homes operates 174 locations across the United States, with the top 10 cities accounting for 52.3% of these. Chesterfield, Virginia leads with 14 locations, followed by Greenville, South Carolina with 12. North Carolina cities Johnston and Mecklenburg each have 10 locations, while Berkeley and Lexington in South Carolina have 9 each.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Eastwood Homes locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Eastwood Homes operates a total of 174 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Eastwood Homes locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Eastwood Homes has 174 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Eastwood Homes locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Eastwood Homes is operating from different prespectives.

Eastwood Homes has the highest number of locations in North Carolina (75) and South Carolina (54), though their land areas are unspecified. Among states with known land areas, Georgia is the largest at approximately 153,905 km² with 8 locations, while Virginia is smaller at about 110,786 km² with 37 locations.

Eastwood Homes operates 75 business locations across four states in the United States, with the highest number in North Carolina (52 open out of 75). Virginia has the highest percentage of open businesses at 73.0%, followed closely by Georgia at 75.0%. South Carolina has 66.7% of its 54 locations currently open.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Eastwood Homes. Using ratings and review totals from 174 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Eastwood Homes has its highest average rating in Georgia at 4.7, followed by Virginia with 4.6. North Carolina and South Carolina have average ratings of 4.4 and 4.2, respectively. North Carolina leads in review volume with 896 reviews, significantly more than South Carolina's 375, Virginia's 138, and Georgia's 75.
Eastwood Homes received the highest number of reviews from North Carolina with 896, followed by South Carolina at 375. Virginia and Georgia had 138 and 75 reviews respectively. Georgia led in average rating with 4.7, while Virginia, North Carolina, and South Carolina had average ratings of 4.6, 4.4, and 4.2 respectively.

Eastwood Homes has complete phone coverage in four states within the United States. North Carolina leads with 75 out of 75 listings having phone numbers, followed by South Carolina with 54 out of 54. Virginia and Georgia also show full coverage, each with 100% phone availability for their listings.
Eastwood Homes POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.