There are 136 Duke Energy locations in the United States of America as of February 16, 2026. The state or territory with the most Duke Energy locations is NorthCarolina, with 57 sites, accounting for roughly 41.9% of the total.


Duke Energy operates 136 United States of America locations across 15 states. Largest clusters are in NorthCarolina, Florida, and Indiana; the top 10 states contain 96.3% of sites. Coverage is thinner in NewYork, Vermont, and Wyoming.

Duke Energy shows strong visitor engagement: 1 locations are above the mean traffic score (mean: 48.86) and 0 qualify as highly visited.
Duke Energy operates 136 locations across the United States, with 72.1% concentrated in the top three states: North Carolina (57 locations, 41.9%), Florida (22 locations, 16.2%), and Indiana (19 locations, 14.0%). The top ten states account for 96.3% of all locations. Indiana offers the best access with one location per 357,074 people, while Texas is the most stretched, with one location serving over 9.7 million residents.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Mecklenburg, Hamilton, Wake, Greenville, and Pinellas. The top 10 cities account for 35.3% of U.S. sites.

Duke Energy operates 136 locations across the United States, with the top 10 cities accounting for 35.3% of these. Mecklenburg, North Carolina, leads with 11 locations, followed by Hamilton, Ohio, and Wake, North Carolina, each with 7. Several Florida and North Carolina cities appear multiple times in the top 10, highlighting regional concentration.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Duke Energy locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Duke Energy operates a total of 136 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Duke Energy locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Duke Energy has 136 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Duke Energy locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Duke Energy is operating from different prespectives.

Duke Energy's locations in the United States are concentrated primarily in North Carolina, with 57 sites, though its land area is unspecified there. Texas has the largest state land area at approximately 695,668 km² but hosts only 3 locations. Indiana, with the smallest land area of about 94,331 km² among listed states, contains 19 locations. Other states like Florida and Ohio have substantial land areas over 100,000 km² with varying location counts.

Duke Energy operates a total of 131 locations across 10 states in the United States. North Carolina has the highest number of open sites at 47, representing 82.5% of its 57 total locations. Kentucky, Pennsylvania, Arizona, and the District of Columbia each have 100% of their sites open, though with fewer total locations. Texas shows the lowest open percentage at 33.3%, with only one of its three locations currently open.
This view compares activity near Duke Energy locations across states. Using traffic scores observed around 136 sites, it highlights the busiest markets, states with a high share of above-average locations, and areas where activity is comparatively light. Use it to benchmark performance, prioritize field operations, and spot expansion or optimization opportunities.

Duke Energy's busiest location in the United States is in North Carolina, with 1 busy site out of 57 total, representing 1.8%. All other states, including Indiana, Florida, and South Carolina, report zero busy locations despite having multiple total sites. Texas and Pennsylvania have the fewest total sites, with 3 and 2 respectively, and no busy locations.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Duke Energy. Using ratings and review totals from 136 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Duke Energy's highest average rating is in Texas at 3.4, followed by North Carolina with 2.4, and Florida and Indiana both at 2.2. Arizona's average rating is not available. North Carolina leads in review volume with 1,751 reviews, followed by Florida with 1,064 and South Carolina with 526.
Duke Energy's highest number of reviews come from North Carolina with 1,751, followed by Florida with 1,064. Texas has the highest average rating at 3.4, while North Carolina, Florida, and Indiana have lower average ratings of 2.4, 2.2, and 2.2 respectively. Arizona's average rating data is unavailable. South Carolina and Ohio also contribute notable review counts with 526 and 353 reviews.

Duke Energy provides full phone coverage across all its locations in ten states within the United States. North Carolina has the highest count with 57 sites fully covered, followed by Florida with 22 and Indiana with 19. Each state listed, including smaller markets like Arizona and the District of Columbia, reports 100% phone coverage.
Duke Energy POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.