There are 82 DTE Energy locations in the United States of America as of February 16, 2026. The state or territory with the most DTE Energy locations is Michigan, with 80 sites, accounting for roughly 97.6% of the total.


DTE Energy operates 82 United States of America locations across 3 states. Largest clusters are in Michigan, Ohio, and Texas; the top 10 states contain 100.0% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Michigan, Ohio, and Texas.

DTE Energy operates 82 locations across the United States, with 97.6% (80 locations) concentrated in Michigan. Ohio and Texas each have a single location, representing 1.2% of the total. Michigan offers the best access with one location per approximately 125,724 people, while Texas is the most stretched, serving over 29 million people per location. All locations are within these three states.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Wayne, SaintClair, Monroe, Kent, and Oakland. The top 10 cities account for 81.7% of U.S. sites.

DTE Energy operates 82 locations across the United States, with the majority concentrated in Michigan. Wayne leads with 41 locations, representing half of the total. The top 10 cities collectively account for 81.7% of all locations, highlighting a strong regional focus within the state. Other notable cities include SaintClair with 6 locations and Monroe with 4.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple DTE Energy locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. DTE Energy operates a total of 82 nationwide.

The complete dataset of DTE Energy locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

DTE Energy has 82 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for DTE Energy locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how DTE Energy is operating from different prespectives.

DTE Energy's presence spans three states in the United States, with Michigan hosting the most locations at 80 across 250,486 km². Texas is the largest state by land area at 695,668 km² but has only one location. Ohio is the smallest state in terms of land area at 116,098 km² and also has a single location.

DTE Energy's business status in the United States shows that Michigan has 80 locations, with 67.5% (54) currently open and 26 closed. Ohio has one location, which is open, representing 100% open status. Texas has one location listed but none are open or closed, indicating no active business presence.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward DTE Energy. Using ratings and review totals from 82 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

DTE Energy's highest average rating is in Ohio with a score of 4.1, followed by Michigan at 2.2. Texas has no available average rating. Michigan leads in the number of reviews with 1,570, while Ohio has 15 reviews and Texas has none.
DTE Energy's highest average rating comes from Ohio at 4.1, while Michigan has a notably lower average rating of 2.2. Michigan leads in total reviews with 1,570, followed by Ohio with 15 reviews. Texas has no recorded reviews and no available average rating.

DTE Energy provides phone coverage in three states within the United States of America. Michigan has full coverage with 80 out of 80 locations having phone access, representing 100%. Ohio and Texas each have one location, both with 100% phone coverage.
DTE Energy POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.