There are 16 Diligent Delivery Systems locations in the United States of America as of January 26, 2026. The state or territory with the most Diligent Delivery Systems locations is Texas, with 6 sites, accounting for roughly 37.5% of the total.


Diligent Delivery Systems operates 16 United States of America locations across 10 states. Largest clusters are in Texas, California, and Arizona; the top 10 states contain 100.0% of sites. Coverage is thinner in NewJersey, Tennessee, and Washington.

Diligent Delivery Systems shows strong visitor engagement: 3 locations are above the mean traffic score (mean: 37.86) and 0 qualify as highly visited.
Diligent Delivery Systems operates 16 locations across 10 states in the United States, with Texas hosting the largest share at 37.5% (6 locations). California and Arizona follow with 2 and 1 locations respectively, together accounting for 18.7% of the total. Kentucky, Louisiana, and Texas offer the best access with the lowest population per location, while California, Georgia, and Washington are the most stretched, having the highest population per location. The top three states represent 56.2% of all locations, and the top ten states cover 100%.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Bergen, Bexar, Dallas, Denver, and EastBatonRouge. The top 10 cities account for 62.5% of U.S. sites.

Diligent Delivery Systems operates 16 locations across the United States, with 10 cities each hosting a single location. These top 10 cities, including Bergen (New Jersey), Dallas (Texas), and Denver (Colorado), collectively represent 62.5% of the total locations. No city has more than one location, indicating a wide geographic distribution.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Diligent Delivery Systems locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Diligent Delivery Systems operates a total of 16 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Diligent Delivery Systems locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Diligent Delivery Systems has 16 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Diligent Delivery Systems locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Diligent Delivery Systems is operating from different prespectives.

Diligent Delivery Systems operates across several U.S. states, with Texas having the largest land area at approximately 695,668 km² and hosting six locations. California follows with an area of about 423,965 km² and two locations. Kentucky has the smallest land area among the listed states at roughly 104,651 km², with one location. Notably, New Jersey's land area data is unavailable.

Diligent Delivery Systems operates exclusively open locations across ten U.S. states, with no closures reported. Texas leads with six open sites, followed by California with two. Each of the remaining eight states, including Colorado, Arizona, and Washington, maintains a single open location, resulting in a 100% open rate nationwide.
This view compares activity near Diligent Delivery Systems locations across states. Using traffic scores observed around 16 sites, it highlights the busiest markets, states with a high share of above-average locations, and areas where activity is comparatively light. Use it to benchmark performance, prioritize field operations, and spot expansion or optimization opportunities.

Diligent Delivery Systems operates busiest locations primarily in Louisiana, where 100% of its single site is busy. Texas ranks second with 33.3% of its six locations marked as busy. All other states, including California, Arizona, and Georgia, report no busy locations among their respective single or multiple sites.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Diligent Delivery Systems. Using ratings and review totals from 16 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Diligent Delivery Systems has the highest average rating of 5.0 in Arizona. Louisiana and Tennessee both have an average rating of 4.0, while Texas has a lower average rating of 3.6. Texas leads in review volume with 317 reviews, followed by Colorado with 29 and Tennessee with 17. Kentucky's average rating data is unavailable.
Diligent Delivery Systems received the highest number of reviews in Texas with 317, followed by Colorado with 29 reviews. Arizona leads in average rating at a perfect 5.0, while Texas has a lower average rating of 3.6. Louisiana and Tennessee both have an average rating of 4.0. Kentucky's average rating data is not available.

Diligent Delivery Systems has full phone coverage across all locations in the United States of America listed. Texas leads with 6 out of 6 sites having phone access, followed by California with 2 out of 2. Eight other states, including Arizona, Colorado, and Georgia, each have one site with 100% phone coverage. Every state in the table reports a complete phone presence at their respective sites.
Diligent Delivery Systems POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.