There are 10 Comfort Hot Tubs locations in the United States of America as of January 12, 2026. The state or territory with the most Comfort Hot Tubs locations is California, with 3 sites, accounting for roughly 30.0% of the total.


Comfort Hot Tubs operates 10 United States of America locations across 6 states. Largest clusters are in California, Florida, and Georgia; the top 10 states contain 100.0% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Indiana, NewMexico, and Oregon.

Comfort Hot Tubs has 10 locations across six states in the United States, with California and Florida each hosting three locations, representing 30% each of the total. These top three states account for 70% of all locations. Oregon offers the best access with one location serving approximately 4.2 million people, while California is the most stretched, with one location per about 13.1 million residents.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Alameda, Bernalillo, Citrus, Flagler, and Hancock. The top 10 cities account for 100.0% of U.S. sites.

Comfort Hot Tubs operates 10 locations across the United States, each city hosting one location. The top cities include Alameda, Los Angeles, and San Francisco in California, along with others in Florida, New Mexico, Indiana, Georgia, and Oregon. These top 10 cities collectively represent 100% of the brand's locations nationwide.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Comfort Hot Tubs locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Comfort Hot Tubs operates a total of 10 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Comfort Hot Tubs locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Comfort Hot Tubs has 10 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Comfort Hot Tubs locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Comfort Hot Tubs is operating from different prespectives.

Comfort Hot Tubs operates in several U.S. states with varying land areas. California is the largest state by land area at approximately 423,965 km², hosting three locations. Florida also has three locations but covers a smaller area of about 184,934 km². Indiana is the smallest state listed, with an area of roughly 94,331 km² and one location.

Comfort Hot Tubs has a total of 10 locations across six states in the United States. Georgia is the only state with a 100% open rate, having one open location. California has one open location out of three, resulting in a 33.3% open rate. The remaining states—Florida, Indiana, Oregon, and New Mexico—have no open locations despite having a total of six sites.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Comfort Hot Tubs. Using ratings and review totals from 10 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Comfort Hot Tubs has an average rating of 5.0 in California and New Mexico, the only states with available ratings. California leads with 45 reviews, followed by New Mexico with 18. Florida, Georgia, and Indiana have no recorded reviews or average ratings.
Comfort Hot Tubs received the highest number of reviews in California with 45, followed by New Mexico with 18 reviews. California and New Mexico both have an average rating of 5.0, while Florida, Georgia, and Indiana have no recorded reviews or average ratings. California leads in both total reviews and average rating among the states listed.

Comfort Hot Tubs has full phone coverage in six states across the United States, with each state showing 100% phone availability. California and Florida each have three locations with phones, while Georgia, Indiana, New Mexico, and Oregon each have one location fully covered. This indicates consistent phone access for all listed locations within these states.
Comfort Hot Tubs POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.