There are 36 ChampionX locations in the United States of America as of April 18, 2026. The state or territory with the most ChampionX locations is Texas, with 23 sites, accounting for roughly 63.9% of the total.


ChampionX operates 36 United States of America locations across 8 states. Largest clusters are in Texas, Kansas, and Oklahoma; the top 10 states contain 100.0% of sites. Coverage is thinner in California, Colorado, and Louisiana.

ChampionX operates 36 locations across the United States, with Texas hosting the majority at 23 sites, representing 63.9% of the total. The top three states—Texas, Kansas, and Oklahoma—account for 80.6% of all locations. Wyoming offers the best access with the lowest population per location at 288,964, while California is the most stretched, with one location serving over 39 million people. All locations are distributed within ten states.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Ector, FortBend, Midland, Lea, and Barton. The top 10 cities account for 52.8% of U.S. sites.

ChampionX operates 36 locations across the United States, with over half (52.8%) concentrated in the top 10 cities. Ector, Texas, leads with 5 locations, followed by Fort Bend and Midland, Texas, each hosting 3 locations. Notably, the top 10 cities include multiple Texas locations and single sites in states like Kansas, Wyoming, and Oklahoma.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple ChampionX locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. ChampionX operates a total of 36 nationwide.

The complete dataset of ChampionX locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

ChampionX has 36 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for ChampionX locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how ChampionX is operating from different prespectives.

ChampionX's state land area presence in the United States is led by Texas, covering 695,668 km² with 23 locations. Kansas and Oklahoma follow with areas of 213,099 km² and 181,038 km², each hosting 3 locations. Louisiana has the smallest land area at 135,652 km², with just one location.

ChampionX operates in multiple U.S. states, with Texas having the highest total locations at 23, of which 73.9% (17) remain open. All locations in Oklahoma, Kansas, Wyoming, New Mexico, Colorado, Louisiana, and California are fully operational, each showing a 100% open rate. Texas is the only state with any closed locations, totaling five.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward ChampionX. Using ratings and review totals from 36 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

ChampionX's highest average ratings in the United States are in California at 4.6, followed by New Mexico with 4.5, and Wyoming at 4.4. Colorado and Louisiana have no available average rating data. Texas leads in the number of reviews with 155, significantly more than Oklahoma's 42 and California's 9.
ChampionX received the highest number of reviews in Texas with 155, followed by Oklahoma with 42 reviews. California, despite having only 9 reviews, ranks highest in average rating at 4.6, closely followed by New Mexico at 4.5 and Wyoming at 4.4. Some states like Colorado and Louisiana have missing average rating data.

ChampionX achieved 100% phone coverage in all listed states across the United States. Texas had the highest total count with 23 phones, while Kansas and Oklahoma each had 3. New Mexico and Wyoming both had 2 phones, and California, Colorado, and Louisiana each had 1 phone covered.
ChampionX POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.