There are 34 Ceres Solutions locations in the United States of America as of April 18, 2026. The state or territory with the most Ceres Solutions locations is Indiana, with 30 sites, accounting for roughly 88.2% of the total.


Ceres Solutions operates 34 United States of America locations across 2 states. Largest clusters are in Indiana and Michigan; the top 10 states contain 100.0% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Indiana and Michigan.

Ceres Solutions operates 34 locations across the United States, with 88.2% (30 locations) situated in Indiana and 11.8% (4 locations) in Michigan. Indiana offers the best access with one location per 226,147 people, while Michigan is the most stretched, with one location serving 2,514,480 people. The top two states account for 100% of the brand's locations.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Jasper, Montgomery, Miami, Elkhart, and Fulton. The top 10 cities account for 55.9% of U.S. sites.

Ceres Solutions operates 34 locations across the United States, with 55.9% of these concentrated in its top 10 cities. Jasper, Indiana, leads with 4 locations, followed by Montgomery, Indiana, with 3. Several other Indiana cities, including Miami, Elkhart, Fulton, and Wabash, each have 2 locations, while smaller cities like Benton, Berrien, Cass, and Huntington have a single location each.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Ceres Solutions locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Ceres Solutions operates a total of 34 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Ceres Solutions locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Ceres Solutions has 34 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Ceres Solutions locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Ceres Solutions is operating from different prespectives.

Ceres Solutions operates in two states within the United States of America, with Michigan having the largest land area of 250,486 km² and Indiana the smallest at 94,331 km². Despite Michigan's larger area, Indiana hosts more locations, totaling 30 compared to Michigan's 4.

Ceres Solutions operates 34 locations across Indiana and Michigan in the United States. Indiana has 29 open locations out of 30, representing 96.7% operational status, while Michigan has 3 open locations out of 4, with a 75.0% open rate. Overall, the brand maintains a high proportion of open facilities in both states.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Ceres Solutions. Using ratings and review totals from 34 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Ceres Solutions has its highest average rating in Indiana with a score of 4.1, followed by Michigan at 3.8. Indiana also leads in the number of reviews, totaling 121, while Michigan has 49 reviews. These states represent the top performers for the brand in the United States.
Ceres Solutions received the highest number of reviews in Indiana with 121, followed by Michigan with 49. Indiana also had the highest average rating at 4.1, while Michigan's average rating was 3.8. These two states lead both in review volume and customer satisfaction for the brand in the United States.

Ceres Solutions achieved full phone coverage in both Indiana and Michigan, with 30 out of 30 locations in Indiana and 4 out of 4 locations in Michigan having phone access. Both states show a 100% phone coverage rate.
Ceres Solutions POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.