There are 43 Central Bark locations in the United States of America as of June 02, 2026. The state or territory with the most Central Bark locations is Wisconsin, with 14 sites, accounting for roughly 32.6% of the total.


Central Bark operates 43 United States of America locations across 15 states. Largest clusters are in Wisconsin, Florida, and Illinois; the top 10 states contain 88.4% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Minnesota, Oregon, and SouthCarolina.

Central Bark operates 43 locations across the United States, with Wisconsin hosting the largest share at 14 locations (32.6%). The top three states—Wisconsin, Florida, and Illinois—account for 55.8% of all locations. Wisconsin also has the best access with one location per 420,152 people, while Texas is the most stretched, with one location per 14,621,671 residents. The top ten states represent 88.4% of the total locations.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Milwaukee, Waukesha, Dupage, Lake, and Buncombe. The top 10 cities account for 41.9% of U.S. sites.

Central Bark operates 43 locations across the United States, with Milwaukee, Wisconsin hosting the highest number at 5 locations. The top 10 cities collectively account for 41.9% of all locations, including notable counts in Waukesha, Wisconsin (3 locations), and Dupage and Lake, Illinois (2 locations each). Several cities have a single location, reflecting a diverse geographic distribution.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Central Bark locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Central Bark operates a total of 43 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Central Bark locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Central Bark has 43 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Central Bark locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Central Bark is operating from different prespectives.

Central Bark locations in the United States are distributed across states with diverse land areas. Texas is the largest state listed, covering 695,668 km², but hosts only 2 locations. Wisconsin, with 169,636 km², has the highest number of locations at 14. Ohio is the smallest state by area among those listed, spanning 116,098 km², and also has 2 locations.

Central Bark operates 14 locations in Wisconsin with a 100% open rate, the highest total among listed states. Florida has 6 locations with 83.3% currently open, the only state showing any closures (1 closed). All other states, including Illinois, Pennsylvania, New York, and Texas, maintain a 100% open status across their locations.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Central Bark. Using ratings and review totals from 43 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Central Bark's average ratings are highest in Florida, Illinois, New York, North Carolina, and Ohio, each with an average rating of 4.8. Wisconsin leads in the number of reviews with 1,771, followed by Florida with 955 and Pennsylvania with 502. Illinois and Ohio also have substantial review counts, at 496 and 305 respectively.
Central Bark's highest average ratings of 4.8 were recorded in Florida, Illinois, New York, North Carolina, and Ohio. Wisconsin led in total reviews with 1,771, followed by Florida with 955 and Pennsylvania with 502. Illinois and Ohio also contributed significant review counts, with 496 and 305 respectively.

Central Bark achieved 100% phone coverage across all listed states in the United States. Wisconsin leads with 14 locations fully covered, followed by Florida with 6 and Illinois with 4. Each of the remaining states has between 1 and 3 locations, all with complete phone coverage.
Central Bark POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.