There are 36 Camp Gladiator locations in the United States of America as of January 12, 2026. The state or territory with the most Camp Gladiator locations is Texas, with 28 sites, accounting for roughly 77.8% of the total.


Camp Gladiator operates 36 United States of America locations across 6 states. Largest clusters are in Texas, Florida, and NorthCarolina; the top 10 states contain 100.0% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Arizona, Georgia, and Tennessee.

Camp Gladiator shows strong visitor engagement: 4 locations are above the mean traffic score (mean: 39.72) and 0 qualify as highly visited.
Camp Gladiator has a total of 36 locations across six states in the United States, with Texas holding the majority at 28 locations, representing 77.8% of the total. The top three states—Texas, Florida, and North Carolina—account for 91.7% of all locations. Texas offers the best access with one location per approximately 1.04 million people, while Georgia is the most stretched with one location per over 10.7 million residents. All locations are distributed within the top ten states.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Harris, Dallas, Rockwall, Travis, and Montgomery. The top 10 cities account for 83.3% of U.S. sites.

Camp Gladiator has a total of 36 locations in the United States, with 83.3% concentrated in the top 10 cities. Harris, Texas leads with 7 locations, followed by Dallas with 5 and Rockwall with 4. Most top cities are in Texas, while Seminole, Florida and Wake, North Carolina each have 2 locations.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Camp Gladiator locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Camp Gladiator operates a total of 36 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Camp Gladiator locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Camp Gladiator has 36 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Camp Gladiator locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Camp Gladiator is operating from different prespectives.

Camp Gladiator has the highest number of locations in Texas, which is also the largest state by land area at approximately 695,668 km². Florida follows with 3 locations and a land area of about 184,934 km². Tennessee is the smallest state listed, covering roughly 109,116 km², with only one location. Some states, such as North Carolina, have missing land area data despite having multiple locations.

Camp Gladiator locations in the United States show the highest number of open businesses in Texas, with 21 out of 28 sites open, representing 75%. Florida has three locations, all closed, resulting in a 0% open rate. States like Georgia and Arizona each have one location, both fully open at 100%. North Carolina has two locations with a 50% open rate, while Tennessee has one location that is closed.
This view compares activity near Camp Gladiator locations across states. Using traffic scores observed around 36 sites, it highlights the busiest markets, states with a high share of above-average locations, and areas where activity is comparatively light. Use it to benchmark performance, prioritize field operations, and spot expansion or optimization opportunities.

Camp Gladiator's busiest location in the United States is found in North Carolina, where 50% of its two locations are busy. Texas has the highest number of total locations at 28, but only one is busy, representing 3.6%. Florida, Arizona, Georgia, and Tennessee each have no busy locations despite having between one and three total locations.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Camp Gladiator. Using ratings and review totals from 36 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Camp Gladiator's average ratings vary across states in the United States, with Florida having the highest average rating of 3.0, followed by Texas at 2.9 and Tennessee at 2.3. Arizona and Georgia have no available average rating data. Texas leads significantly in review count with 605 reviews, while other states like North Carolina, Florida, and Tennessee have fewer than five reviews each.
Camp Gladiator's highest number of reviews comes from Texas with 605, while North Carolina, Florida, and Tennessee have only 3 to 4 reviews each. Arizona has zero reviews recorded. Among states with available ratings, Florida leads with an average rating of 3.0, followed by Texas at 2.9 and Tennessee at 2.3; average ratings for Arizona and Georgia are not available.

Camp Gladiator achieves full phone coverage in all its locations across six states in the United States. Texas leads with 28 out of 28 sites having phone access, followed by Florida with 3, North Carolina with 2, and Arizona, Georgia, and Tennessee each with 1 location fully covered. Each state reports 100% phone coverage.
Camp Gladiator POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.