There are 30 CALRegional locations in the United States of America as of June 02, 2026. The state or territory with the most CALRegional locations is California, with 26 sites, accounting for roughly 86.7% of the total.


CALRegional operates 30 United States of America locations across 3 states. Largest clusters are in California, Texas, and Arizona; the top 10 states contain 100.0% of sites. Coverage is thinner in California, Texas, and Arizona.

CALRegional operates 30 locations across the United States, with 86.7% (26 locations) concentrated in California. Texas and Arizona have 3 and 1 locations respectively, making up the remaining 13.3%. California offers the best access with one location per approximately 1.51 million people, while Texas is the most stretched, serving about 9.75 million people per location. All locations are within these top three states.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Sacramento, LosAngeles, Sonoma, Solano, and Alameda. The top 10 cities account for 60.0% of U.S. sites.

CALRegional operates 30 locations across the United States, with 60% concentrated in its top 10 cities. Sacramento and Los Angeles, California, each host three locations, the highest counts among the cities listed. Sonoma, Solano, Alameda in California, and Bexar in Texas each have two locations. The remaining cities have one location each, indicating a focused presence primarily in California.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple CALRegional locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. CALRegional operates a total of 30 nationwide.

The complete dataset of CALRegional locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

CALRegional has 30 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for CALRegional locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how CALRegional is operating from different prespectives.

CALRegional's data for the United States shows Texas as the largest state by land area at 695,668 km², while Arizona is the smallest among the top states with 295,220 km². California, with 423,965 km², has the highest number of locations at 26, compared to Texas's 3 and Arizona's single location.

CALRegional operates exclusively with open businesses across three states in the United States. California leads with 26 open locations, followed by Texas with 3, and Arizona with 1. All 30 locations are fully operational, reflecting a 100% open rate in each state.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward CALRegional. Using ratings and review totals from 30 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

CALRegional's highest average rating is in California at 4.9, followed by Texas at 4.7, while Arizona's average rating is not available. California also leads in review volume with 4,416 reviews, significantly more than Texas's 392 reviews. Arizona has no recorded reviews.
For CALRegional in the United States, California leads with the highest number of reviews at 4,416 and an average rating of 4.9. Texas follows with 392 reviews and an average rating of 4.7. Arizona has no recorded reviews, and its average rating is not available.

CALRegional achieved full phone coverage in all listed states within the United States of America. California had the highest total with 26 phones, all covered, resulting in 100% coverage. Texas and Arizona also reported complete coverage, with 3 and 1 phones respectively. Each state reached a 100% phone coverage rate.
CALRegional POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.