There are 13 Bouldering Project locations in the United States of America as of January 12, 2026. The state or territory with the most Bouldering Project locations is Washington, with 4 sites, accounting for roughly 30.8% of the total.


Bouldering Project operates 13 United States of America locations across 8 states. Largest clusters are in Washington, Texas, and Arizona; the top 10 states contain 100.0% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Minnesota, NewYork, and Utah.

Bouldering Project shows strong visitor engagement: 5 locations are above the mean traffic score (mean: 35.23) and 1 qualify as highly visited.
Bouldering Project has 13 locations across eight states in the United States, with Washington leading at 4 locations (30.8% share) and Texas following with 3 locations (23.1%). The top three states account for 61.5% of all locations, while the top ten cover 100%. Washington offers the best access with one location per approximately 1.9 million people, whereas Texas is the most stretched, serving about 9.7 million people per location.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as King, Travis, Dallas, Hennepin, and DistrictofColumbia. The top 10 cities account for 100.0% of U.S. sites.

Bouldering Project operates 13 locations across the United States, with King, Washington hosting the highest number at 4. Texas cities Travis and Dallas have 2 and 1 locations respectively, while seven other cities each have a single location. The top 10 cities collectively account for 100% of the brand's locations nationwide.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Bouldering Project locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Bouldering Project operates a total of 13 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Bouldering Project locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Bouldering Project has 13 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Bouldering Project locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Bouldering Project is operating from different prespectives.

Bouldering Project's locations in the United States span states with diverse land areas. Texas is the largest state listed, covering 695,668 km² with 3 locations, while Massachusetts is the smallest at 27,335 km² with 1 location. Washington has 4 locations across 184,668 km², the highest count among the states. Some states like the District of Columbia and New York have location data but lack area measurements.

Bouldering Project operates a total of 13 locations across eight U.S. states. Washington has the highest number with four locations, all currently open. Texas shows the only closed location, with two open and one closed out of three total. All other states have a single location, each fully open except Utah, which has one location that is closed.
This view compares activity near Bouldering Project locations across states. Using traffic scores observed around 13 sites, it highlights the busiest markets, states with a high share of above-average locations, and areas where activity is comparatively light. Use it to benchmark performance, prioritize field operations, and spot expansion or optimization opportunities.

Bouldering Project has busy locations in eight states across the United States. Arizona, District of Columbia, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, and Utah each have one location, all of which are busy, representing 100% busy rates. Texas and Washington have multiple locations, with Texas showing 33.3% (1 of 3) busy and Washington 25.0% (1 of 4) busy.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Bouldering Project. Using ratings and review totals from 13 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Bouldering Project's highest average ratings in the United States are in Minnesota and Texas, both at 4.7, followed by Utah and Washington at 4.6, and Massachusetts at 4.4. Texas leads in review volume with 2,280, significantly ahead of Washington's 1,228 and Massachusetts' 800. Minnesota, despite its top average rating, has 346 reviews, ranking fifth in review count.
Bouldering Project's highest average ratings are in Minnesota and Texas, both at 4.7, followed by Utah and Washington at 4.6. Texas leads in total reviews with 2,280, more than double Washington's 1,228 reviews. Massachusetts ranks third in reviews with 800, while Minnesota holds a top rating but has fewer reviews at 346.

Bouldering Project has full phone coverage across all its locations in the United States. Washington leads with 4 out of 4 sites having phones, followed by Texas with 3 out of 3. Each of the other states—Arizona, District of Columbia, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, and Utah—has one location, all with phone access, resulting in a 100% coverage rate in every state.
Bouldering Project POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.