There are 129 BNSF Railway locations in the United States of America as of January 26, 2026. The state or territory with the most BNSF Railway locations is Texas, with 17 sites, accounting for roughly 13.2% of the total.


BNSF Railway operates 129 United States of America locations across 24 states. Largest clusters are in Texas, Illinois, and California; the top 10 states contain 74.4% of sites. Coverage is thinner in DistrictofColumbia, SouthDakota, and Utah.

BNSF Railway shows strong visitor engagement: 14 locations are above the mean traffic score (mean: 48.01) and 5 qualify as highly visited.
BNSF Railway has 129 locations across the United States, with Texas hosting the highest count at 17 locations (13.2%), followed by Illinois with 14 (10.9%) and California and Washington each with 12 (9.3%). The top three states account for 33.3% of all locations, while the top ten states represent 74.4%. Kansas, Nebraska, and Wyoming offer the best access, each with populations per location under 290,000, whereas Tennessee, Utah, and California have the highest population per location, exceeding 3.2 million.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Tarrant, LosAngeles, Wyandotte, Cook, and King. The top 10 cities account for 31.0% of U.S. sites.

BNSF Railway operates 129 locations across the United States, with its top 10 cities accounting for 31% of these sites. Tarrant, Texas leads with 6 locations, followed by Los Angeles, California, Wyandotte, Kansas, and Cook, Illinois, each hosting 5 locations. Other notable cities include King, Washington and San Bernardino, California, with 4 locations each.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple BNSF Railway locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. BNSF Railway operates a total of 129 nationwide.

The complete dataset of BNSF Railway locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

BNSF Railway has 129 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for BNSF Railway locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how BNSF Railway is operating from different prespectives.

BNSF Railway operates across multiple U.S. states with Texas having the largest land area at approximately 695,668 km² and 17 locations. Illinois is the smallest state by area in this dataset, covering about 149,995 km² but hosting 14 locations. California and Washington both have 12 locations, with areas of roughly 424,000 km² and 185,000 km² respectively. Several states, including Kansas, Nebraska, and Oklahoma, have between 7 and 11 locations, with areas ranging from about 181,000 km² to 213,000 km².

BNSF Railway's business status across ten U.S. states shows high operational presence, with Kansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, and Minnesota maintaining 100% open locations. Texas leads in total sites at 17, with 88.2% open, while Washington and Colorado have the lowest open percentages at 66.7%. Illinois and Nebraska have no closed locations except Nebraska with one closure, reflecting strong operational continuity.
This view compares activity near BNSF Railway locations across states. Using traffic scores observed around 129 sites, it highlights the busiest markets, states with a high share of above-average locations, and areas where activity is comparatively light. Use it to benchmark performance, prioritize field operations, and spot expansion or optimization opportunities.

BNSF Railway's busiest locations in the United States are primarily concentrated in Illinois, which has the highest share with 3 out of 14 locations busy, representing 21.4%. Minnesota and New Mexico follow closely, each with 1 busy location out of 5, accounting for 20%. Other states like Colorado, Oklahoma, and California have lower busy location percentages, ranging from 8.3% to 16.7%, while Nebraska has no busy locations among its seven total.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward BNSF Railway. Using ratings and review totals from 129 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

BNSF Railway's highest average ratings in the United States are in Minnesota and Texas, both with a 4.1 rating. California, Kansas, and Washington follow closely with average ratings of 3.9. Illinois leads in total reviews with 1,854, while California and Texas also have significant review counts of 1,063 and 796, respectively.
BNSF Railway's highest average ratings are in Minnesota and Texas, both at 4.1, followed by California, Kansas, and Washington at 3.9. Illinois leads in total reviews with 1,854, significantly ahead of California (1,063) and Texas (796). Washington and Oklahoma rank fourth and fifth in review counts, with 269 and 221 respectively.

BNSF Railway achieves full phone coverage in all listed states within the United States. Texas leads with 17 locations, all equipped with phones, followed by Illinois with 14 and California and Washington each with 12. Every state reported has a 100% phone coverage rate, highlighting consistent communication access across these regions.
BNSF Railway POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.