There are 66 Bearing Distributors Inc. locations in the United States of America as of February 16, 2026. The state or territory with the most Bearing Distributors Inc. locations is Ohio, with 7 sites, accounting for roughly 10.6% of the total.


Bearing Distributors Inc. operates 66 United States of America locations across 33 states. Largest clusters are in Ohio, Illinois, and Connecticut; the top 10 states contain 56.1% of sites. Coverage is thinner in SouthCarolina, Virginia, and Washington.

Bearing Distributors Inc. shows strong visitor engagement: 1 locations are above the mean traffic score (mean: 47.28) and 0 qualify as highly visited.
Bearing Distributors Inc. operates 66 locations across the United States, with Ohio leading at 7 locations (10.6% share), followed by Illinois with 6 (9.1%). The top three states account for 25.8% of all locations, while the top ten states represent 56.1%. Connecticut offers the best access with the lowest population per location (902,829), whereas Florida is the most stretched, having over 21.6 million people per location.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Cuyahoga, Will, Allen, Adams, and BlackHawk. The top 10 cities account for 18.2% of U.S. sites.

Bearing Distributors Inc. operates 66 locations across the United States, with the top 10 cities accounting for 18.2% of these. Cuyahoga, Ohio, and Will, Illinois, each host two locations, while the remaining eight cities have one location each. This distribution indicates a relatively dispersed presence without a dominant city concentration.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Bearing Distributors Inc. locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Bearing Distributors Inc. operates a total of 66 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Bearing Distributors Inc. locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Bearing Distributors Inc. has 66 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Bearing Distributors Inc. locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Bearing Distributors Inc. is operating from different prespectives.

Bearing Distributors Inc. has multiple locations across U.S. states with varying land areas. Texas is the largest state by land area at 695,668 km², hosting three locations, while Connecticut is the smallest at 14,358 km² with four locations. Ohio and Illinois have seven and six locations respectively, despite smaller land areas compared to Texas and Michigan. Several states, including New York, have location counts but missing land area data.

Bearing Distributors Inc. operates primarily in Ohio, Illinois, and Connecticut, with Ohio and Connecticut showing a 100% open business status. Illinois has 83.3% of its locations open, while Texas has the lowest open percentage at 66.7%, with one location closed. Most states, including Missouri, Michigan, New York, Wisconsin, North Carolina, and Nebraska, report all their locations as open.
This view compares activity near Bearing Distributors Inc. locations across states. Using traffic scores observed around 66 sites, it highlights the busiest markets, states with a high share of above-average locations, and areas where activity is comparatively light. Use it to benchmark performance, prioritize field operations, and spot expansion or optimization opportunities.

Bearing Distributors Inc. reports the highest proportion of busy locations in Texas, with 33.3% of its three locations active. Ohio follows with one busy location out of seven, representing 14.3%. All other states listed, including Connecticut, Michigan, and Illinois, show no busy locations among their totals.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Bearing Distributors Inc.. Using ratings and review totals from 66 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Bearing Distributors Inc. achieved perfect average ratings of 5.0 in Missouri, Nebraska, New York, and Wisconsin, with Connecticut following at 4.2. Ohio led in review volume, contributing 32 reviews, while Connecticut, Illinois, North Carolina, and Michigan had between 4 and 9 reviews each.
Bearing Distributors Inc. received the highest average ratings of 5.0 in Missouri, Nebraska, New York, and Wisconsin, with Connecticut following at 4.2. Ohio led in total reviews with 32, significantly surpassing other states, while Connecticut, Illinois, North Carolina, and Michigan had 9, 6, 5, and 4 reviews respectively.

Bearing Distributors Inc. achieves full phone coverage in all listed states across the United States, with each state showing 100% of locations equipped with phones. Ohio leads with 7 out of 7 locations having phone coverage, followed by Illinois with 6 out of 6. Several states, including Connecticut, Missouri, Michigan, New York, Texas, Wisconsin, Nebraska, and North Carolina, also maintain complete phone coverage at all their locations.
Bearing Distributors Inc. POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.