There are 33 Animal Health International locations in the United States of America as of March 17, 2026. The state or territory with the most Animal Health International locations is Texas, with 7 sites, accounting for roughly 21.2% of the total.


Animal Health International operates 33 United States of America locations across 17 states. Largest clusters are in Texas, Nebraska, and California; the top 10 states contain 78.8% of sites. Coverage is thinner in Oklahoma, SouthDakota, and Utah.

Animal Health International shows strong visitor engagement: 0 locations are above the mean traffic score (mean: 45.43) and 0 qualify as highly visited.
Animal Health International operates 33 locations across the United States, with Texas leading at 7 locations (21.2% share). The top three states—Texas, Nebraska, and California—account for 45.5% of all locations, while the top ten states cover 78.8%. Nebraska, Montana, and Hawaii offer the best access with the lowest population per location, whereas California, Florida, and Minnesota have the highest population per location, indicating more stretched coverage.
Locations concentrate around major metros such as Tulare, Whatcom, Adams, Churchill, and Curry. The top 10 cities account for 36.4% of U.S. sites.

Animal Health International operates 33 locations across the United States, with the top 10 cities accounting for 36.4% of these sites. Tulare, California, and Whatcom, Washington, each host the highest number of locations at two apiece. The remaining top cities, including Adams (Nebraska) and Honolulu (Hawaii), each have a single location.
Street-level clusters show corridors where multiple Animal Health International locations sit within the same neighborhood indicating strong local presence and coherence. Animal Health International operates a total of 33 nationwide.

The complete dataset of Animal Health International locations across the United States of America is available for download, including coordinates, traffic patterns, and operational status.

Animal Health International has 33 locations across the United States of America. The key variables shows the most infleuntial aspects for Animal Health International locations nationwide. This provides a closer look of how Animal Health International is operating from different prespectives.

Animal Health International's locations in the United States are distributed across states with varying land areas. Texas, the largest state listed, spans 695,668 km² and hosts 7 locations, while Hawaii is the smallest at 28,412 km² with 1 location. Other notable states include California (423,965 km², 3 locations) and Nebraska (200,329 km², 5 locations). The brand's presence covers states ranging from large areas like Montana (380,840 km²) to smaller ones such as Alabama (135,767 km²).

Animal Health International operates 26 locations across 10 states in the United States. Nebraska, California, Montana, Colorado, Florida, South Dakota, and New Mexico each have 100% open businesses, with Nebraska having the highest count of 5 open locations. Texas has the largest total number of locations at 7, with 85.7% currently open. Washington shows a balanced status with 50% of its 2 locations open, while Hawaii has one location that is not open.
This view compares activity near Animal Health International locations across states. Using traffic scores observed around 33 sites, it highlights the busiest markets, states with a high share of above-average locations, and areas where activity is comparatively light. Use it to benchmark performance, prioritize field operations, and spot expansion or optimization opportunities.

Animal Health International has no busy locations across all listed states in the United States. Each state, including California with 3 total locations and Texas with the highest count of 7, shows a 0.0% busy rate. The brand operates a total of 26 locations in these ten states, none currently marked as busy.
This section summarizes customer sentiment toward Animal Health International. Using ratings and review totals from 33 locations, we highlight where scores are consistently high and where feedback volume is greatest. Average star ratings reflect perceived quality, while total reviews indicate engagement and reach across the network.

Animal Health International's highest average ratings in the United States are found in Washington (4.9), Montana (4.8), and Nebraska (4.7). Florida and South Dakota both have strong average ratings of 4.6. California leads in review volume with 52 reviews, followed by Montana with 32 and Nebraska and Texas each with 28.
Animal Health International's highest average ratings come from Washington (4.9), Montana (4.8), and Nebraska (4.7). California leads in total reviews with 52, followed by Montana with 32 and Nebraska with 28. Notably, Florida ranks high both in average rating (4.6) and review count (16).

Animal Health International's phone coverage in the United States shows full coverage across all listed states, with 100% of locations having phone access. Texas leads with 7 locations, followed by Nebraska with 5, and California with 3. Each of the other states has between 1 and 2 locations, all fully covered by phone.
Animal Health International POI data enables clear measurement of footprint and demand. Analysts can rank states and cities by location count, compare coverage on a per-capita basis, and use traffic scores and review volumes to spot high-performing markets and under-served pockets. The result is an objective view of saturation, growth opportunities, and performance outliers.
For network planning, the data supports scoring candidate trade areas using location density, population per location, and nearby traffic intensity. Teams can evaluate cannibalization risk via nearest-store distance, surface whitespace along key corridors, and prioritize sites near retail anchors, campuses, or transit where observed activity is strongest.
Planners can map clusters and service gaps to understand commercial access at the neighborhood level. Per-capita coverage highlights communities with limited access, while changes in openings or closures signal shifts in activity. These insights inform corridor revitalization, streetscape and transit planning, and data-driven zoning decisions.